this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
778 points (99.2% liked)

News

35962 readers
3336 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 336 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is how you do it when you're serious about achieving what you promise for your constituents. Use your tools as needed, demand cooperation, when you don't get it, use your tools as leverage. Even if you fail, people see you did what you could and then they're ready to punish whoever stood in your way at the ballot box. This is why the oligarch class is so afraid of Mamdani who's just a mayor.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 104 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm a NYC resident, and I pay property taxes. If this is the stick that will (hopefully) get us the carrot of a wealth tax, I'm all for it. If property taxes end up going up, and we can use it to make the city better with the services Mamdani wants to get going, well then let's go. I will figure out how to pay the additional taxes somehow. With that said, let this be a bargaining chip. Working with the rest of NYC's political class is like a bunch of toddlers. The best thing you can do is give them two options, one you want (which they won't like) and one you don't want (which they really won't like). And make them pick. So they feel like they have agency, it's their decision, don'tchaknow?

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] JTode@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Don Tchak never! The dude is completely corrupt, and I hear he has some very nasty sexual proclivities.

[–] homes@piefed.world 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It’s a little bit misleading to refer to as any mayor of New York City as “just a mayor“.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's just a tiny little financial capitol of the world with a measley population of only 8.4 million people.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And what did Austria ever achieve???

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If NYC was a state it would be between the 11th and 12th most populous state.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And California is the world's 4th largest economy, behind only the entire rest of the United States, China, and Germany. New York State would be 8th.

The Democratic states and cities are economic and sociopolitical leaders for a reason. Don't listen to the bullshit calling them socialist hellholes. The evidence suggests that taking care of your people (and maybe even having illegal immigrants too gasp or better yet legal immigrants) is actually an economically sound, and maybe even economically preferable strategy overall.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Illegal immigrants are one of the strongest boosters of the economy, since they are a source of cheap skilled labor. You’d have to be totally stupid to intentionally throw away that advantage.

I agree that it would be better to make them legal however. I believe in free movement and commerce.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I agree that it would be better to make them legal however. I believe in free movement and commerce.

100% Nobody wants to be in this situation.

The system simply doesn't allow for people to enter 'in the right way', as far as the vast majority of non-rich people around the world are concerned the US Border is closed unless you win a literal lottery.

We clearly need these people and benefit from their presence both economically and culturally. Instead of creating an immigration system that reflects that reality, we have one that makes them live in the shadows and deal with exploitation because they cannot access normal public services, including the police, for fear of being arrested (possibly violently) and thrown in detention for an unspecified amount of time.

It has to be different, and not in the ways that these white nationalists cosplaying as law enforcement are envisioning.

[–] deadmyk@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I love when people say the us should get rid of CA. Yeah let’s just throw away the worlds 4th largest economy because you’re anti woke 🙄

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

You can also casually remind people that more Republicans live in California than Texas, which usually makes their head explode. It's an enormous state, with a huge economy, with tons and tons of people.

[–] homes@piefed.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People like that are willing to do or say anything in order to get validation for their shitty beliefs

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

I mean everyone has something they value more than economics... For some, those are bad values, but it's not unique.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

The population of NYC is larger than the combined population of the smallest 28 countries in the world.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Second largest city in north america?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Uh doesn’t this just inflict pain on the middle class if it ends up passing?

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does the middle class own property in New York at all? I thought most just rent apartments.

[–] fiendishplan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

NYC is 5 boroughs a lot of it is single family or 2 family housing.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And you think land lords won't pass increased property taxes on to their tenants?

I don't live in NYC so I won't give an opinion on this but landlords won't just eat increased taxes.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most people dont make over 1,000,000 a year. A millionaires tax, like the one passed in Washington state, only taxes 9.9% of every dollar OVER ONE MILLION. The first million has the same tax rate as everyone else.

They still keep 90.1% of every dollar over one million. It is not as if it is forfeit. They will still be making a shit ton of money.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Talking about the property tax, not the wealth tax. And even though it’s lower than other parts of the country, a third of NYC denizens own their homes, so a property tax increase seems like it’d have a lot of collateral effects on the not-so-wealthy.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I feel you there. Washington state has no income tax, so there are so many levers we can pull to raise revenue. Property tax is one of the big ones. Every time I get a ballot to vote on, there is some new levy they want to add. I generally vote yes, because I want schools to be funded and parks taken care of, but it does get to a point where our tax system is regressive.

Wealth taxes make sense. Those who can afford to pay a small amount more should step up. Mamdani's plan of raising taxes on wealthy New Yorkers by -2%- is even less than what was passed in Washington state.