this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
359 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5974 readers
1172 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
359
Even when I'm mocking AI bros, they don't get it (discuss.online)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was in a group chat where the bro copied and pasted my question into ChatGPT, took a screenshot, and pasted it into the chat.

As a joke, I said that Gemini disagreed with the answer. He asked what it said.

I made up an answer and then said I did another fact check with Claude, and ran it through "blast processing" servers to "fact check with a million sources".

He replies that ChatGPT 5.1 is getting unreliable even at the $200 a month model and considering switching to a smarter agent.

Guys - it's not funny anymore.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From the context, it seems to be a question which answer isn’t easily verifiably. So it is a question unsuitable for LLMs

Have you ever used a chatbot ? , the fact that an answer is unverifiable doesn't stop them answering at all.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Have you ever used a chatbot ? , the fact that an answer is unverifiable doesn’t stop them answering at all.

Yes, I've use chatbots. And yes, I know that they always manage to generate answer full of conviction even while wrong. I never said otherwise.

My point is about the person using a chatbot/LLM needs to be able to easily verify if a generated reply is right or wrong, otherwise it doesn't make much sense using LLMs, because they could have just researched the answer directly instead.