this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
422 points (97.1% liked)

Not The Onion

20351 readers
1787 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘It is rule 62 of the Olympic Charter that we have to have a condoms story,’ says IOC spokesman Mark Adams

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You think there are no female athletes?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm astounded so many of you cannot pick up the sarcasm in, "it's okay to get AIDS" and "women what?"

At times, I swear the levels of acumen here flirt with Facebook's.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I think Lemmy has a higher than average percentage of neurotypical people who don't pick up sarcasm at all.

[–] X@piefed.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I’m astounded you’d assume the average sarcasm detection acuity would be much different here than on Facebook.

There’s no correlation between having a federated account and high sarcasm detection success. Poe’s law wasn’t developed out of sheer boredom.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

It has nothing to do with one's ability to detect text tone better than another cohort. It is simply using the brain for a split second to evaluate which is more likely; a pro-AIDS misogynistic Lemmy user, or someone taking the piss on the fact Lemmy users are much the opposite.

It is clearly "Amiright, guys?" character humour and really only requires some minimal effort to realise that.

Though, at this point it really doesn't matter as those that think for themselves by looking at what others thought (the vote counters) will contribute by following suit.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

which is more likely; a pro-AIDS misogynistic Lemmy user, or someone taking the piss on the fact Lemmy users are much the opposite.

I've been seeing users of a mgtow instance, so the first option really isn't that unlikely.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Well this is certainly refreshing. Enjoy your weekend!