News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Funny how gung ho Lemmy is about states' rights all of a sudden.
States’ rights for what? States’ rights for what, motherfucker?
V low effort trolling, do better
That's the spirit! Anyone with a different opinion from mine can only be trolling, and doubly so if their opinion requires me to - gasp - question literally anything at all. Echo chambers are the Lemmy way, after all.
If you're not happy with the state of the place, why do you come here?
It’s not an issue of opinion, it’s that your argument is logically insufficient and you sound stupid.
No, I just have basic pattern recognition, sowwy sweety
The bandwagon effect is strong here. They condemn Trump for "rigging" elections, yet they're perfectly comfortable downvoting anything that doesn't fit their paradigm regardless of how correct it is. That undermines the intended purpose of upvoting and downvoting.
I believe the word for that is hypocrisy.
I really thought this comment was satire, then I got to the end and the satire turn never happened. Turns out it was just stupid.
He’s right, though. Isn’t he? All you saw was “states’ rights,” and your immediate reaction was, “He supports slavery,” even though his comment had nothing to do with slavery. States’ rights are a legitimate constitutional concept. They exist independently of racism.
You were so locked into your presuppositions that the only response you could imagine was satire.
You advocate for federal authority when it suits you, and then invoke states’ rights when that is more convenient.
The logical fallacies just keep stacking higher.
The irony of posting this comment in this specific chain would be hilarious if it weren't so sad.
Nah. That joke started when racist hillbillies used it as an excuse for a war to keep the right to own people. The irony is on the other foot.
Except you don't have to look 150 years ago to find literally dozens of modern issues where Lemmy happens to disagree with an individual state's decision and demands that whatever issue it is be blanket mandated at the federal level.
Actually supporting states' rights means supporting their right to sovereignty even when they make decisions you disagree with. The way Lemmy does it is to constantly demand federalization until the rare occasion when states' rights happen to be useful to their argument, and then suddenly they're all literalist constitutional scholars.
"States rights" on who should have the authority to ban weed or abortion is a categorically different situation from a question on who decides control of the very system itself when that answer is defined in the Constitution. Turns out things that are different are different.
Whatever gets you past the cognitive dissonance, chief.
What about States rights to regulate their militia?
k, i guess it is fascism then, ey?
Fascism delivered by a paedophile, no less.
I mean, federal overreach can certainly be seen as kinda like fascism, I suppose, though I think it dilutes an important term to say so under normal circumstances.
Under the current administration, though, yeah, it's definitely fascism.