this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
77 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

42207 readers
631 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
77
An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me – More Things Have Happened (theshamblog.com)
submitted 8 hours ago by Midnitte@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I’ve talked to several reporters, and quite a few news outlets have covered the story. Ars Technica wasn’t one of the ones that reached out to me, but I especially thought this piece from them was interesting (since taken down – here’s the archive link). They had some nice quotes from my blog post explaining what was going on. The problem is that these quotes were not written by me, never existed, and appear to be AI hallucinations themselves.

Super disappointing for Arstechnica here.

Like, how does that even happen?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The Arstechnica article with false quotes did, yes.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago

They're investigating as well apparently, with perhaps a response due on Tuesday due to the holiday - but the comment thread is a little painful to read where a moderator had to apologize because they didn't comprehend what the problem was at first...

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Thanks for the context