this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
585 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
4896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hacker News.

Author blog about thatHacker News.

AI generated quotes in a story about AI clanker writing a blog post about a human developer because they didn't accept their code contributions.

How deep can someone go here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 44 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I pointed out a month ago that Ars Technica is a rot site and starting to be filled with AI regurgitated bullshit and got 80+ down votes and a few uneducated replies.

Y'all feel better now?

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 31 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

No, the issue we are talking about today and calling Ars an "internet rot site" is a huge leap. Yeah, they post shit articles from Wired and such, (they are owned by Conde Nast), but their core writers are still great and have plenty of good articles.

You want credit for what? Over exaggerating an issue then whining about it?

You are throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and then spitting on the baby. It makes no sense.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It’s been going downhill for some time. I think the Condé Nast investment pretty much killed it. The last unnecessary site redesign that didn’t work correctly and made things unreadable was the last straw for me. I took it out of my rotation of “daily reads” and haven’t missed it.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world -5 points 3 hours ago

Simp a little harder for them next time. They appreciate it.

[–] dogzilla@masto.deluma.biz 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

@sartalon @technology Yeah, I have a lot more trust in the reputation that Ars has built over a decade of solid reliable tech journalism than I do in a random matplotlib maintainer - I’ve interacted with maintainers before. They’re not wrong about agents, but not sure how that’s any different from any human doing the same.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Ars has been around since the mid 1990s. Granted the sale to Conde Nast changed them slowly over time, as well as broadening the focus significantly, but it was likely a case of grow or die since the PC nerd market isn't anywhere near what it used to be.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Ars hasn't been good in a few years. Fuck those people.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca -1 points 8 hours ago

Stuff like this makes me very sympathetic to lemmy instances that disable downvotes