this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
287 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
3674 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

The author of this article spends an inordinate amount of time humanizing an AI agent, and then literally saying that you should be terrified by what it does.

Watching fledgling AI agents get angry is funny, almost endearing. But I don’t want to downplay what’s happening here – the appropriate emotional response is terror.

No, I don't think I will, and neither should you. Nothing terrifying happened. Angry blog posts are a dime a dozen (if we take for granted the claim that an AI wrote one), and the corporate pro-AI PR the author repeats is equally unimpressive.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

He’s not telling you to be terrified of the single bot writing a blog post. He’s telling you to be terrified of the blog post being ingested by other bots and then seen as a source of truth. Resulting in AI recruiters automatically rejecting his resume for job postings. Or for other agents deciding to harass him for the same reason.

Edit: I do agree with you that he was a little lenient with how he speaks about the capabilities of it. The fact that they are incompetent and still seen as a source of truth for so many is what alarms me

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

You're describing things that people can do. In fact, maybe it was just a person.

If he thinks all those things are bad, he should be "terrified" that bloggers can blog anonymously already.

Edit: I agree with your edit

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The "bot blog poisoning other bots against you and getting your job applications auto-rejected" isn't really something that would play out with people.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Rumors don't work remotely the same way as the suggested scenario.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's a 1:1 correlation. Are you not familiar with any of the age-old cautionary tales about them?

https://youtu.be/ajBrcoEQauU

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Its not a 1:1 correlation. The efficacy of an AI spreading a rumor to other AI has the potential to be far more rapid, pervasive, and much more dangerous than humans spreading rumors amongst themselves.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Are you saying you have specific evidence of this (then please do show exactly how AI will do something people haven't already), or are you saying "potential" because you don't?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)