Programming

25522 readers

373 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

After a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by name (EDIT: See description and comments regarding 404) (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to c/programming@programming.dev

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

EDIT: The original link is now a 404 because Ars Technica apparently fabricated quotes, or possibly even generated the article in an extreme case of irony.

Here is some context:
https://mastodon.social/@nikclayton/116065459933532659
https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

Here is the original (partially fabricated) archived article if you still want to read it: https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course they were fabricated, by an AI.
More seriously, which quotes were you referring to?

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like the quotes from the person that wrote the blog

https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/116065340523529645

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Yep, I saw in some other threads, Ars used AI which misquoted the original blog. "Hey, look at this weird unreliability caused by AI" says article riddled with AI unreliabilities.