this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
1136 points (95.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

29741 readers
1855 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Anything built by AI/LLMs should be FOSS by law. Oh I dream of the day.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago

Your wish is granted.

But you can only view the source code through an LLM

a finger on the monkey paw curls

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Not FOSS, just public domain.

[–] squirrel@piefed.kobel.fyi 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago
[–] inari@piefed.zip -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It already is, vibe coders cannot hold copyright on AI-generated code

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not to be pedantic, not holding copyright ≠ FOSS.

FOSS explicitly means that the developer has a copyright and is explicitly giving a license for people to use it with FOSS provisions.

It would be more accurate to say AI Vibe code is in the public domain.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 0 points 1 day ago

Public domain code is a subset of FOSS code, so I don't think that was inaccurate

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not entirely true, it doesn't make it FOSS.

  1. Vibe coders sign a contract when they use AI to generate stuff, which gives rights away to the company. Regardless of copyright protections from the state, a contract is in most cases legally binding.

  2. Copyright law requires human authorship as opposed to random generation. This doesn't inherently exclude all generative works, algorithms that were carefully crafted and datasets curated can potentially have their results considered "authored" but the AI Company owners that made them.

In order to make it true we need to pass laws that regulate the AI companies and their slop. In the meantime, I recommend nobody uses slop code. Actually, I'd recommend that regardless of ownership rights.

[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I signed no contracts to download the open source local models I use for code generation, just for what it's worth

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, that model. Of course. You're right. I would know because I have read the details for every model in existence and can clearly infer which one you're talking about. Yes.

[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There's lots of open source models you can download from Hugging Face, Ollama, and even github without signing any contracts or terms of use. Gemma3, Llama, Ministral, GLM, olmo, and a bajillion others. GLM-4.7-Flash is a very capable agentic model that can run at very usable speeds on commodity hardware - and none of what it generates is dictated by any agreements or policies agreed to anywhere.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms

You agreed to these terms when you downloaded Gemma3 from an official source and if you did not then you're an unlicensed user AKA piracy.