Fuck AI

On one hand, it's disgusting how we treat some people.

On the other, I gotta love the irony. So you're telling me an AI knows what thousands of naked female bodies look like, but not this one woman, because we assume she's never posted a nude. So it takes her size, skin tone, and maybe assumes a few other things about her (like does she shave?) and it finds a nude body that matches what it knows about her and attaches her face/head to it. And now we're saying that's a nude of her?

I've seen probably hundreds/thousands of naked women online, and maybe a dozen IRL? And it's true what they say, you see one, you wanna see 'em all. But the original phrase is true, too. You've seen one, you've basically seen them all. Sure, there are size/style differences, but for the most part if you know what female genitals look like, what breasts look like, your imagination can do enough of the work. So can AI. It doesn't mean that woman has shown you her nude body, because that implies a level of trust. Or she's making money off of it or whatever.

I think it's high time we start accepting that if we don't see it IRL, chances are not zero that it's fake — and accept and treat it as fake until we're told otherwise. Because you never know. And the point I'm driving at is, we should assign an appropriate value to it — zero — until we're proven it's real.

So if you show me a nude woman, and she's of legal age and she's not related to me or someone I know, I'm probably gonna smile and nod. But if she's of any condition I don't like — not legal, and/or someone I know, and/or someone related to me — I'm just gonna assume it's AI. Because why the fuck not. Like your sister, maybe you were bathed together when you were kids, you saw when she was small, but you haven't seen her since puberty, since she's grown, and you don't want to. So say someone sends you a nude of her. It looks reasonably accurate. It's her face, her figure as best you'd guess, but you don't know what her nipples and vulva look like exactly and you've never thought to hazard a guess, or her pubic trimming/shaving situation, but now you're seeing that data... in this day and age, you have plenty of plausible deniability to say "there is a non-zero chance this is AI generated" and apply the appropriate value (zero) to that. Because a guy with a sister will look at nudes of women with the same figure as his sister, but he doesn't want to see nudes of his sister. So if he doesn't know what she actually looks like naked, why assume it's real? It's safer, and saner, to assume it's not.

So, why don't we, as decent or decent leaning men (or people, I don't mean to not be inclusive), just assume they're all fake? If for nothing else, for the sake of our humanity and theirs.