this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
437 points (99.3% liked)

politics

28244 readers
1561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When Balint’s time expired, and the out lawmaker yielded back, Bondi asked for a moment to respond, and used it to go on the offensive: “You didn’t ask Merrick Garland anything about Epstein,” she said. Balint shot back: “Weak sauce.”

Bondi then escalated: “And with this anti-Semitic culture right now, she voted against a resolution ...”

Balint cut her off: “Oh really? Do you want to go there, attorney general?” she said. “Talking about antisemitism to a woman who lost her grandfather in the Holocaust?”

The lawmaker then got up and left the room.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bondi is throwing stones in glass houses when she accuses anyone of being shady about the epstein files. What an idiot.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago

Counter-attack, counter accuse. They are all just following the lead of the president, and his party before him, he just took it to an extreme level. It doesn't matter what the facts are. The only way to deal with these people is to ignore their bad faith attacks and counter-attack them. Going on the defensive is what they are used to, and is psychologically works on the low information voters that trust the worst people, a large group.

When you defend against an attack, a charge, it lend credibility to it as confirmed by multiple studies over the decades. As such the manipulators learn when attacked to counter-attack, counter-accuse. The more it makes you go on the defensive the better it works, to obscure the issue with slander and emotional arguments.

Instead, stick with your attack, or answer with your own attack, such as calling out what they are doing and why. But that is considered bad form with our democrats, still playing politics under the 1990 model of Bill Clinton and playing for the monied interests, rejecting populism and reform as the great danger, not the other party.

The Republicans haven't been respecting that old decorum for decades, but this president brought it to a new extreme level, and we continue to afford them courtesies that aren't returned that allows them to walk all over us. That is what the donors want of course, but the donors don't even know what is in their own best interests. Popular reform is the only way to get out from under fascists fixing elections to permanently affix themselves in power, an end that kills the Republic in all but name, the Reason for Being of our politicians and members of all three branches of government to stop, to prevent.

Throwing the game to allow it, is a betrayal of their oaths itself. Ignorance is no excuse, and they aren't ignorant, they know they aren't playing real politik. We need to get some new leaders now, or else. The very least these politicians we are stuck with can do, is not afford courtesies to the republicans in questioning them that allows them to derail any oversight with counter attacks. Stay on message, when they distract with slander, call them on it, and their motivations, undermining the republic, a betrayal, say that. It's true, and it's the only way Bondi and her ilk will learn to respect and fear congressional oversight.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

None of her "testimony" was meant for anything but carefully edited clips to be farmed and replayed by millions of non-Americans on twitter to make a few dollars at the end of the month.

This is just the same rotting attention-economy that made us hate the internet and killed youtube and twitch but being applied to executive and legislative politics. They are not interacting with or engaging with the reality they're being slapped with, they're coasting on media frenzy and their waning political capital in the form of 28% of the population who are armed, illiterate and angry enough to march anywhere they're directed.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah it really seemed like more democrat performative bullshit to pretend to be doing something while doing nothing.