this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

movies

3106 readers
258 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Moreover, analysts suggest that not enough time passed between installments. “Fire and Ash” debuted just three years after “The Way of Water,” a short gap compared with the previous decade-plus wait.

Hahahaha analysts are really grasping for straws, the fact that 2 did that well after such a long wait was more a fluke than anything. The other points about 3’s story being unimportant and the tech being uninteresting explain more

By the 5th movie I’d be surprised if it was more than a vanity project

[–] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What’s fascinating about this franchise is that I always thought it was just a vanity project! It happened to be profitable when it came out because it was kid-friendly.

James Cameron is the king of “why did so many people care about that at the time?”

The public’s obsession with Titanic in 1997 seems eyeroll-inducing now. I remember going to used media stores and copies of Titanic on VHS were everywhere.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah I thought he just wanted to make like, the ultimate 3D movie experience, and being uninterested in 3D, I never went to see it (I also think the character design is pretty bad but whatever). After the latest 3D resurrection died I was surprised to hear of a sequel.