People Twitter

9554 readers

1056 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

689

Advice for new bands (infosec.pub)

submitted 5 days ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Found link to original tweet, per community rule about public figures: https://x.com/i/status/1022978628647186432

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Right, they go where the people are.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

where the people are

They went from 429 million to 250 million in under a year, I would challenge that assumption.

Additionally, a Nazi bar is still a fucking Nazi bar. I don't see why anyone should look favorably on that, do you?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you not think 250 million people is a lot?

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think you're dodging an ugly fucking question and chose to ignore that the amount of users almost halved. I think you're maybe not arguing in good faith, so I'm going to discontinue this conversation. Have a good day!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Ok, but even with losing nearly half of their users they still have a very large user base, and companies go to where the users are. Plus, it's not like Twitter is the only platform they advertise on.

You're arguing in bad faith because you're arguing like this is a justification rather than a reason why, despite me saying it wasn't a justification.