this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
309 points (95.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

29716 readers
1190 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 73 points 4 days ago (8 children)

In over ten years of professional programming, I have never used inheritance without regretting it.

When it's the right tool, it's incredibly useful. When it's the wrong tool, and it often is, it racks up tech debt at an incredible rate.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

This applies to firewall rules too

[–] AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It works great for technical constructs. E.g. A Button is a UI element. But for anything business logic related, yeah it'll suck.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Even then there's rarely a good reason to use inheritance instead of composition.

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

And not once have I regretted removing inheritance.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you include "traits" and "interfaces" under the title "inheritance"?

No because those are different things.

[–] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

It might be nice to use in some very specific cases (e.g. addition-operation is a binary-operation AST node which is an AST node).

In most of the cases it just creates noise though, and you can usually do something different anyway to implement the same feature. For example in rust, just use enums and list all the possible cases and it's even nicer to use than inheritance.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's wild. What did you use it for?

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some legacy Python code that already used inheritance. I had to extend it, and it was pretty infeasible to refactor the whole thing to not use inheritance. Not sure if I technically regretted that decision, but it was definitely painful, since Python inheritance makes it really hard to follow program control flow.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Non typed inheritance, what could go wrong eh. You can just 'add' a function to a class dynamically in python, that is so bad.

Done any C++ classes & inheritance?

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was actually typed. Python had type annotations at the time.

I only wrote C++ very early in my career so I don't remember much, but I'm sure I at least tried some inheritance in toy games I would write. All of that code was trash though by my standards today.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Still does, but you don't have to.

So you haven't had much experience with oop?

I have used OOP design patterns many times, but that doesn't mean I use inheritance a lot. I almost always reach for interfaces instead.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Just don't use inheritance where more than a few descendants are predicted