this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
546 points (97.9% liked)

politics

28244 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (8 children)

There are a lot of really miserable, insufferable kids on Lemmy right now seething about this because it flies in the face of the "voting is useless, everything will be rigged" narrative that they push to validate not wanting to be involved.

Showing up at the polls is not our problem in the US, it's getting people involved enough to actually learn about and read what candidates represent. We had the largest voter turnout in US history over the last couple elections, but people basically voted at random because they tuned out of the political chaos.

It's far more clear this time around who is doing what to disrupt the status-quo in the US and I expect we're going to see a massive swing in the opposite direction between this November and 2028.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am 99% sure it is a CCP effort. Been tracking it for like a year now. Hard to track because it's contagious.

For the love of God always call out doomers for being suspect. They're not here because they're feeling impending doom. They're here to make you feel impending doom.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Russia/Israel/CCP. Almost all of the doomers are voting doesn't work, why aren't you starting a civil war, the dems are just gonna gaza harder than the turnip, etc.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Golly, seems like lots of people don't like you

There are a lot of really miserable, insufferable kids on Lemmy right now seething about this because it flies in the face of the "voting is useless, everything will be rigged" narrative that they push to validate not wanting to be involved.

They don't want to be involved in the actual democratic process, but they reeeeally don't want to shut the fuck up about their irrelevant opinions.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, Im on board with the message overall but I very much think people not getting to the polls is an issue. 90 million chose to sit out last general election. That is a HUGE problem IMO.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It's still important to push the message to not be lazy about going out and doing the thing, especially in mid-terms which get far less turnout.

But that 89mil who did not vote in 2024 is very close to the average percentage that stays home every election anyway. My point is, the sampling of those who did vote, didn't necessarily make me think that if uninterested people did show up, that it would have gone much different.

Of the people who were actually registered and voted in 2024, a vast number of the people who voted for Trump identified as Obama voters and Bernie supporters. People had basically discarded whatever political alignment more informed voters adhere to and just looked at the price of eggs at the time and associated that with Biden/Harris, and that was the most informed opinion shaping voting habits.

People did not watch debates. They did not pay attention to large news stories. They got most of their political news from social media; tweets and facebook memes in the small amount of time they spend scrolling content that isn't entertainment. They did not know what either candidate was advocating and largely didn't care, most thought it didn't effect them either way.

This is all by design, and if we want to talk to about vote manipulation, this is the biggest issue, which is there are too many fake shills and sock-puppets all over social media, even here on Lemmy, who will adopt the stupidest or most radical takes on both sides of every issue until bystanders and browsers roll their eyes at the whole thing and tune out.

There are literally millions of people in India and other countries who farm Twitter for a few dollars every month by pushing rage-bait, arguing with people, pretending to be Americans and pretending to care about our future, while sharing propaganda and memes designed to make people hate political involvement.

Our biggest problem is not turnout but engagement and information.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

It's far more clear this time around who is doing what to disrupt the status-quo

Voters seem, with good reason, to hate whichever party is currently in power is another easy way to read this.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

not even the commie doomers can stop us now

yay democracy!!

[–] Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, this unfortunately. I’m a lot more pragmatic and actually try to vote

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago

There are a lot of really miserable, insufferable kids on Lemmy right now seething about this

I will believe you if you can provide just 2 examples.