this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
22 points (89.3% liked)

GOG

3490 readers
2 users here now

GOG.com is a DRM-free games and movies distribution service that is part of the CD Projekt Group. GOG.com is also a "sister" company to CD Projekt Red, developers of the Witcher series and Cyberpunk 2077.

Rules:

  1. No piracy discussion
  2. No harassment
  3. For post that is not in English, Please tag the language

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dvdnet90@lemmy.world
ardi60@lemmy.ml
moeka89@lemm.ee
meiko60@lemmy.sdf.org
22
Why is GOG not as succesful as a Gaming Alternative? (feddit.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by RetroHax@feddit.org to c/gog@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Now i am someone whos a Huge Fan of DRM Free Gaming (well im in GOG Community go figure :P) and basically what i was always wondering as as to why DRM seems to be so popular still among Gamers considering StarForce and such? >.>

DRM Free Gaming is probably mostly a Thing that probably comes into Old Gamers Minds more than newer ones considering that StarForce and SafeDisc are more or less RetroDRMs that i doubt many Newer Gamers cant phatom really? >.>

But what surprises me the most is that the Voice arent "louder" for even just removing Basic Denuvo after 6 Months off Steam or so >.>
Like for me itd be honestly fine to make a Trade off them just having Denuvo on a New Release for 6 - 12 Months and then removing it honestly as itd love to buy Games such as the Persona Games instead of having to emulate them honestly :P
Where i was wondering as to Why is GOG not the most Popular Gaming Platform?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

A case like this takes money and years of efforts. I don't think any indie dev would be willing to spend that much, especially knowing Valve can afford incredible lawyers. The evidence would have to be really convincing for this to even be worth risking. Those messages not being accurate could also make the plaintiffs liable for lying under oath.