this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
727 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
3789 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Theres a ton of other things I want my TV to do before more pixels.

Actual functional software would be nice, better tracking on high speed shots (in particular sweeping landscapes or reticles in video games) higher frame rates and variable frame rate content, make the actual using of the tv, things like changing inputs or channels faster, oh man so much more.

Anything but more pixels.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Actual functional software would be nice

you do not want software on your TV.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

Yes I do. I want an actual smart TV with a practical, open source, TV-optimitzed Linux OS. It's not that software on a TV is a bad idea in itself. It's how it's ruined by for-profit companies.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, yes and no. I like e-arc, and I like being able to adjust settings other than v-hold. But I don't want this slow crud fest that keeps telling me when my neighbour turns on Bluetooth on their iphone.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like e-arc,

... the audio hdmi thing?

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, all my inputs go to the tv, then i run a wire to the receiver. This makes it so my ps5 and PC are plugged directly to the tv so i can get different resolutions are variable refresh rate and the tv can control the receiver. So when I turn something on, the tv/receiver turn on and set themselves to matching settings, Dolby, stereo, whatever. Its not huge but its a nice convinienice over the older optical connection.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I want software on my TV.

Steam Link specifically. I like streaming to my TV via Ethernet.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can do that with a Raspberry Pi for <$100 and without the need to have Amazon/Google/Roku/whoever tf else collecting your data.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Who says I let Amazon/Google/Roku/whoeverTfElse collect my data?

I have my TV isolated to its own network and allow inputs from LAN, so i can use Steam Link and Jellyfin just fine.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool. Who owns the OS on the TV or the app store where you downloaded JF and SL?

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didnt download Jellyfin or steamlink through an app store. I loaded the .apk onto a USB, plugged it in, and sideloaded it lol.

Any other 'gotcha's?

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like an unnecessary amount of extra work to avoid being spied on by the spyware TV that you bought. You do you, though bud.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

an unnecessary amount of extra work

As opposed to buying, flashing, then installing a raspberry pi? Lol

Edit: using mod powers to censor me calling out your poor behaviour is also poor behaviour. Be better.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly? It's not that far off, with a much better pay off. But like I said, you do you. You wanna die on the smartTV hill for whatever reason, go for it lmao

[–] kinship@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really? Is there a name for finding guides to such wizardry?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So get a device that can do that. You didn't need a piece of software that will never see an update to do this.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's funny that you think smart TVs don't receive updates. It's got a wifi chip for a reason.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tvs can last 20 years you'll be lucky to get 2 years of updates

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

My TV isn't going to update because it's been lobotomized.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not what you said. You said they never receive updates.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

You're thinking of a different commentor I did not say that

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I still probably watch 90% 1080p and 720p stuff lol. As long as the bitrate is good it still looks really good.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Between a poor BluRay copy and a good DVD copy, the DVD always wins out.

[–] Lenggo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have a Samsung frame because I wanted a TV that didn't look so much like I had one, but the software is so goddam bad. The only way to switch sources quickly is to set them as a favorite which isn't always that straight forward if you didn't do it right away. Regardless you have to let the the home page fully render before you can even worry about that. Even the Samsung TV app which you would think would be perfectly optimized for the hardware since the same compare makes the software is barely functional and loads like a web page on AOL in 1998

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I like my frame because it faces a set of windows and with all my other tvs ... I would have to close the blinds to see the tv in the day time.

However, the software is straight garbage. I didn't even know about the favourite thing ... every time I change source it would spend like a minute or two trying to figure out if it could connect to it for no reason.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Couldn't any TV be a "frame tv"

Would you just need some trim?

[–] 0x0 4 points 1 week ago

No, not really