this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
185 points (97.9% liked)

movies

3106 readers
252 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, maybe they're in the wrong field

[–] skribe@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

They just see the glamour and the $$$, and don't know about the ridiculous hours and working conditions (when you're actually working).

When I did film school, our first lecture was 9 hours long. We watched a bunch of experimental films. The second lecture was 7 hours long, watching more (but completely different) experimental films. We started with 300 students, and by the third week we were down to half that. Only a handful of us ever worked professionally and I only know two that are still working (I left a few years ago). It's a brutal industry.

[–] hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Are they? Do modern writers and directors need to care about 60 year old war movies to make their art?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First of all, yes they should. But second, 60 year old war movies aren't the only kind of film that exists...

[–] hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

They're the only kind of film referenced as an example in the article.