this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
349 points (99.4% liked)

Fediverse

40173 readers
551 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just thought I'd note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Some promotional posts were made on Reddit in the right comms, although none of them specifically exploded - albeit one was made also in r/buyCanadian and it seemed to surge.

[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Reddit also upped the enshittification but i cant remember why.

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That was the big one, but there was something else smaller last year.

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

There was something else that happened last autumn/winter that made it even shittier. Cant remember any info and its doing my head in.

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.red 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw it in a post about people getting temp bans for simply stating that EU allies would be right to defend Greenland in case of military action. Might just have been one of several grievances with Reddit at the moment though

[–] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Woah, I haven't heard about this. Are those temp bans on specific subreddits or a site-wide ban for not being pro-Trump?

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.red 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was "threatening violence".

The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf

[–] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don't seem to like, but... how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump repeatedly saying they're gonna own Greenland one way or another is not threatening violence?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

its also too easy to get banned. new accounts and old inactive accounts becoming suddenly active are highly likely to get banned.

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I come specifically from this.

I was intrigued and I had never heard of the fediverse before. The rabbit hole brought me here :)

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

cant be reddit bans, they have largely laid off the massive bans. although i have heard they upped thier methods of detecting would be ban evasion methods.