this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
670 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28244 readers
1561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Go ahead, vote MAGA in the midterms if you're curious how fucked your life can get.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

LOL, I cannot wait until I have my next IRL conversations with the more-leftist-than-thou dumbasses that sat out or voted third party and the Enlightened Centrists that voted for Taco because they fell for the right wing/Russian agitprop that Biden's economy was so terrible and/or that Kamala was genocidal and/or something something "gerontocracy".

JFC.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Maybe you should devote that energy toward more constructive organization efforts within your party, or good faith gestures that build trust and solidarity with new allies? As someone who did hold his nose and voted for the uninspiring, inept Democrat pick who went on to eat shit I have to say this preoccupation with rubbing your party's failure in the face of anyone you failed to reach is... Not inspiring, to put it charitably.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Voting for Kamala was the only sane move. That’s all we were asking for.

We all want Bernie, but the nation is what it is and we’d have been streets ahead with Kamala even. Hopefully AOC someday.

[–] DoctorGirthquake@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, not inspiring and entirely unproductive. Demonizing and pushing those who didn’t vote blue further to the right isn’t helpful, and I’m not saying “both sides are bad” or that we have to compromise with Republicans (I voted for Kamala too).

As fucked as things are, we can either whine about not getting our way until the end of time, or we can do something about it. Comments like OPs push the needle in the wrong direction.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sadly, I'm pretty convinced if Kamala was Male they would currently be president. Trump has only ever beaten a woman, in a race... Or whatever

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

LOL, you must not have much dealings with the type I'm talking about. They are rubbing their high-horse ideals in my face all the time, saying that Taco is more or less the same as Kamala would have been.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Christian USA basically had to choose between the Antichist and your average capital-loving politician and they went "fuck it, I'll vote for satan cause he said he I'll make gas cheaper.". And the pedo-guy still has a 40% approval rating at the current moment. This country is a lost cause.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Propaganda’s a helluva drug

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but also who is controlling the polling info?

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes waste time blaming people who were actually trying to move the needle back to the left but were roundly ignored by a bunch of geriatric genociders who would rather pander to racists and ignoramuses who would never vote for them in the first place than just idk maybe stop committing genocide.

This will totally get those people to vote for the other milque toast white racist that the dems put up as a candidate without any sort of election and just expect everyone to vote for because "at least theyre not trump" without actually having any policy that differs from republicans in any sort of meaningful way.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

without actually having any policy that differs from republicans in any sort of meaningful way.

For all that the dems really do seem to do their best to alienate the left, I'm fairly sure their policy did not include having barely trained, masked, goons running around American cites executing people at will, kidnapping others, and facing no concequences, and yet, trump was clear that it was what he wanted. I'd call that a meaningful difference.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have someone like that in my life. To this day they think masking and “forced gene modifications” are a bigger deal than what happening now. I’ve been lectured so many times about how anger at what’s going on is just being political.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've never heard about forced gene modifications? Are they referencing GMOs, or....?

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

She’s antivax, especially when it comes to the mRNA vaccines, she claims they are a government experiment that we were forced to undergo. She conveniently ignores that the phizer was available and you weren’t mandated unless you wanted access to public services.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, good grief. One of those dead-enders. I find it hilarious when someone I know still holds a grudge about having to get the "jab" to travel, or to work, and so on. The biggest snowflakes.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes it's the individuals that are the problem not the party that chains to be left but sides right every single fucking time.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you honestly think that if Harris won there would be armed agents on the street murdering citizens, driving your economy to historic lows, alienating your closest allies, tanking trade routes, invading Venezuela, kidnapping anyone with a skin colour darker than snow white....

I could go on.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

Did I say that? No you're conflating.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, who else to blame for voters that think Taco and Kamala are the same and that Taco would be "better for 'conomy"? That's the fault of the Democratic Party?

People keep blaming them for anything and everything and how they have to "message better", but the Democrats don't really have any kind of media to get that message out on.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No one said that. But it's inarguable that the Democratic party is in large part responsible for people not wanting to vote for the candidates they put forth knowing full well we want an actual lefty and not a corporate business monster.