this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
899 points (97.1% liked)

RetroGaming

27396 readers
126 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It is on a timeline, but not tech.

If you compare 1985 to 2005, holy shit. So many classics because of mind blowing advances.

2005 - 2025... Well, there's still 2005 games that go hard with some mods. We really rely on gameplay and story to make a classic now.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, once we hit 20 years since the 360's launch, we had 20 year old games that still look pretty decent by today's standards. I don't think you could say that at any point in time before then.

This comment from yesterday stuck with me - I really like this definition of retro being on the tech progress timeline, not just "x years since".