this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
164 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

56368 readers
966 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's a live stream tomorrow on the 'tube setting up a MeshCore companion for sending messages over radio waves directly instead of relying on internet providers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

BTW, Meshcore is MIT and not fully FOSS, while Meshtastic is GPL and fully FOSS.

[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And both use LoRa which is proprietary.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fact, but since that's common and cheap, and I'm not aware of an equivalent FOSS alternative, I'd go with Meshtastic, if were to dabble. And I dabble. :D

[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I believe the only part of Meshcore that's not FOSS is the official app, and there's a FOSS alternative.

Personally, I'd use Meshcore. I tried MT for a month or so. I never saw a conversation, just a few scattered "test" messages. Meanwhile, on MC, I was away from my phone for 4 hours yesterday and came back to 250+ coherent messages in a conversation from all over the region (not to mention the hundreds of test messages).

MT is better in ad-hoc situations since clients can repeat messages, but MC is better for establishing a region-wide communication network.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. Oddly enough, my Meshtastic contacts are much farther away than my farthest MeshCore contacts but MeshCore seems to be much livelier.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A license doesn't have to be copyleft to be FOSS. Stop trying to redefine things because you don't like them.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's not what I did. Not all of Meshcore is FOSS. There are proprietary components. Therefore it's not fully FOSS.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh sorry, I thought "Meshcore is MIT" meant it was all MIT.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

All good!

I still value GPL much higher than MIT, which is why I thought important for others to know, in case they have a preference too. But yeah, Meshcore is just not all open source and some people could also have a preference on that. 😄