this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
107 points (96.5% liked)

Europe

9009 readers
1249 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sustainable@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago (11 children)

You're right about climate change. But for Germany, nuclear power is not the awnser.

  • We don't have a safe, final place to store the waste.
  • We would again be dependend on other countrys, to import uranium.
  • All nuclear power plants are offline and would take a lot of money to modernise / reopen them. To have a significant impact over all we would also need to build more. All of this will easily take more than 10 years.

For us, it is way more cost efficient, faster and safer to invest in solar, wind and battery's.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (10 children)

I live in Germany. I don’t understand the “no space” argument. Just buy a 1km x 1km farm plot in Bayern at one of the known stable rock locations and dig down. The space is there. The footprint is small. Look at the Onkalo site. The above ground footprint is even smaller.

This being said I think long term storage should be a EU level agenda modeled after the Finnish Onkalo model with shared locations.

Germany is already dependent on importing energy sources. So importing uranium ore from Canada is no different. Except we would import from an ally. Even solar which I support requires imports. Wind less so but even then our wind turbines are only partially domestic.

As far as reopening closed plants yah. You are right. I don’t think that is easy to reopen them after such neglect. The short term answer is to buy low CO2 power from France while Germany continues its renewable path. Aka nuclear base energy by proxy.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 7 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

The short term answer is to buy low CO2 power from France

The same France that constantly buys electricity from Germany because of constant issues with their nuclear powerplants?

[–] ratatsouillechan@jlai.lu 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’m afraid it is rather the opposite. Sometimes Germany exports electricity to France, but most of the time it is the contrary.

“ France has been an exporter on all its borders: a very strong exporter on the borders with Germany and Belgium, Switzerland, Italy and Great Britain”

https://analysesetdonnees.rte-france.com/bilan-electrique-2024/echanges#Detailparfrontiere

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's a back and forth, yes. Though quite often the cause for France needing an urgent power injection is issues with their nuclear powerplants. With ever hotter and drier summers leaving powerplants with little to no water as coolant and the aging buildings requiring more and more maintenance.

I can't find the article right now but sometime late last year Germany had its yearly "Dunkelflaute" scare (Dunkelflaute refers to a time when neither sun is shining nor wind blowing for renewables) and it turned out during this exact timeframe we even exported to France because of troubles with their reactors.

[–] ratatsouillechan@jlai.lu 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In 2025 France exported 31TWh to Germany and Belgium and imported 4TWh. I would say the issue with nuclear is that it cannot follow load changes quickly and therefore needs other sources to compensate peaks. There has been a time a few years ago with maintenance issues you are right. However right now it is available at 85% which is a high score. In comparison today, a cloudy day, only 14-20% of solar and wind renewables are producing power.

Availability values here: https://analysesetdonnees.rte-france.com/en/generation/generation-availability

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Yes, nuclear reactors can't do load balancing. However they can neither meet basic demand when they have to be stopped because of a lack of coolant or for repairs.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)