this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
1223 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
3723 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As evidence, the lawsuit cites unnamed "courageous whistleblowers" who allege that WhatsApp and Meta employees can request to view a user's messages through a simple process, thus bypassing the app's end-to-end encryption. "A worker need only send a 'task' (i.e., request via Meta's internal system) to a Meta engineer with an explanation that they need access to WhatsApp messages for their job," the lawsuit claims. "The Meta engineering team will then grant access -- often without any scrutiny at all -- and the worker's workstation will then have a new window or widget available that can pull up any WhatsApp user's messages based on the user's User ID number, which is unique to a user but identical across all Meta products."

"Once the Meta worker has this access, they can read users' messages by opening the widget; no separate decryption step is required," the 51-page complaint adds. "The WhatsApp messages appear in widgets commingled with widgets containing messages from unencrypted sources. Messages appear almost as soon as they are communicated -- essentially, in real-time. Moreover, access is unlimited in temporal scope, with Meta workers able to access messages from the time users first activated their accounts, including those messages users believe they have deleted." The lawsuit does not provide any technical details to back up the rather sensational claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 115 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well if I can't trust Meta with my information, who CAN I trust

[–] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 57 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] usernameusername@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Oh okay. My location is 55.752121, 37.617664, my full name is Jeremy, and my password is hunter9. I trust you not to tell this to anybody

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] usernameusername@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh god damnit chemicalprofet why did you tell this guy i thougjt i could trust you :((

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All I see is '••••••'

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

I see '******' though.
Maybe it's just a different interface.

[–] EdgeOfDistraction@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Just like Cher (which is short for Cheremy).

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Your secret is safe with us and our 36,893 affiliates.

[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Legitimate interest, though 🤞

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nice to see the ancient lore alive.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago
[–] Buffy@libretechni.ca 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can confirm, chemicalprophet is the best password manager I've ever used.

[–] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 months ago

Ah! You did your own research!

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The drunk dude that's always sitting on the ground near the park entrance and sell weird tissue dolls with curly hairs is more trustworthy, I'd say.