this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
817 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4180 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As evidence, the lawsuit cites unnamed "courageous whistleblowers" who allege that WhatsApp and Meta employees can request to view a user's messages through a simple process, thus bypassing the app's end-to-end encryption. "A worker need only send a 'task' (i.e., request via Meta's internal system) to a Meta engineer with an explanation that they need access to WhatsApp messages for their job," the lawsuit claims. "The Meta engineering team will then grant access -- often without any scrutiny at all -- and the worker's workstation will then have a new window or widget available that can pull up any WhatsApp user's messages based on the user's User ID number, which is unique to a user but identical across all Meta products."

"Once the Meta worker has this access, they can read users' messages by opening the widget; no separate decryption step is required," the 51-page complaint adds. "The WhatsApp messages appear in widgets commingled with widgets containing messages from unencrypted sources. Messages appear almost as soon as they are communicated -- essentially, in real-time. Moreover, access is unlimited in temporal scope, with Meta workers able to access messages from the time users first activated their accounts, including those messages users believe they have deleted." The lawsuit does not provide any technical details to back up the rather sensational claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 74 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

would bring a lot of users to better alternatives.

Most users of whatsapp don't care about e2e. They hardly even know what it is.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

True. But some would care about broken promises

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

They don't know what e2e encryption is, but they sure as hell know what "employees have access to all your messages" means. Sure, it makes it harder for them to find a good alternative, but it will scare some away from Meta (unknown how many will actually care).

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Right. This place sometimes forget that we are tiny community of techies that hate the system. Makes me see this place as a bit of a circlejerk at times.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah the venn diagram overlap of “people who understand and care about e2ee enough to drop a messaging app for not supporting it” and “people who use whatsapp” has to be a sliver

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 10 hours ago

No but average people understand the concept of meta reading and accessing your private message. That would be a scandal and righly so

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 5 points 12 hours ago

They don't but they do know what "Any Meta employee, and every US government employees, can read all of your messages" means

Especially if they saw it now