this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
460 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27480 readers
2945 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you're suggesting that we... don't arm ourselves, and that we should just stand by and let them kill us...make up your mind

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I am saying that being armed and predisposed to peace go together. It gives people the option to fight if it becomes necessary. The Black Panthers are the way.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly.

All the gun nuts leap at the idea that they can grab a rifle and fix the world. And they shit on the actual legacy of The Black Panthers by distilling them down to that.

The vast majority of what made/makes The Black Panthers effective is that they focus so much on community outreach. Far more time is spent getting to know the neighbors and families than sending bullets downrange. All because the goal is to NOT fire a shot. Because the shitbags understand... if you shoot Jamal then you are going to be attacked by multiple city blocks worth of people who can personally talk about how Jamal helped make sure their kids got home safe or literally just gave them a chance to talk through their pains and worries

Instead, all the gun nuts are leaping at the chance to justify buying a new optic or buying a third ar-15. And... there is definitely a lot of "Wow. Even the Libertarians think we should abolish ICE" going on.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Like maybe a year ago Americans taking pot shots at ICE might have spooked them back into their basements. But now ICE has galvanized a culture of general oppression. They're just itching to Tiananmen an entire peaceful protest.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Eh. I think they would still shit themselves if they started wondering what those whizzing and popping noises were.

But it would basically work "once". Then they would just assume any mass of protesters were black kids with toy trains and unload with their ar-15s. And every single "raid" would become a no knock where they just sneak up and kick down the door and flashbang and shoot at any kids they see while "getting their man". Because now they are up against an army of terrorists.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Yup. The multiple clips of them saying to the effect of, "haven't you people learned yet?" is so damning.