this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
1719 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4287 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

and fucking invest into not needing to use American-controlled CPUs as every single one of them contains a backdoor.

China has been working intensely for at least 2 decades to catch up, and they are still about a decade behind!

Netherlands has ASML which is a huge advantage for European independent manufacturing, but even with that it's an insanely expensive investment to make a realistic competitor to AMD, Intel, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom etc. because they have loads of patents that are hard to avoid, and they have decades of know how. This is not even accounting for the software infra structure that would have to be built almost from scratch.
Chip production is a global enterprise, and even USA isn't independent anymore. They depend on ASML and TSMC for their most popular products in AI, Smartphones, servers, laptops and desktops. And more and more Arm is taking over from Intel/AMD.

What we may be able to do would be using Arm and have TSMC help us with manufacturing. But to make such a project succeed is not an easy thing, we had European computer companies in the 70's and 80's that were heavily subsidized by governments that dominated home markets for several European countries, and they essentially all failed against international competition.
So what we risk if we were required to use a European product funded by EU/European governments would be to have to use an overpriced under-performing technology, that would be a millstone around the neck of all of Europe, making Europe not catch up, but instead fall further behind.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

they have loads of patents that are hard to avoid

China doesn't care about patents of outsiders.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Seems to me that it’s time for the rest of the world to invalidate US IP and go from there.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

And the rules based international order has been exposed as the wink during a handshake deal. Who cares about patent law?

[–] shrugs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He is talking about software. A fucking video conferencing tool not controlled by American tech is no ASML level investment.

We could at least start with this

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

American-controlled CPUs

[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

matters in the hands of closed source software and suspicious hardware