this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
233 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 149 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Finishing an item on an assembly line every 6 seconds does not mean it only takes 6 seconds to assemble the item. It only means that the slowest step of the process takes a maximum of 6 seconds/item to complete.

[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Not even that. For example if there are 10 assembly lines in parallel that the slowest step takes 60 seconds, you still get a phone each 6 seconds

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Hell you can even parallelize the slow parts so the fast parts aren't waiting as much

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago

I was considering parallel processes in the same facility as a single production line in this case, as the article seems to consider the production mentioned as a single line...but yes, if it is indeed split between multiple lines producing the phones entirely and in parallel that is the case.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

That was my reaction to the headline. Then I read the article:

Xiaomi said assembling a smartphone from circuit board to finished product takes about six seconds, and, at full capacity, the factory could produce more than 10 million devices annually

They are indeed stating each phone only takes 6 seconds to complete

With ~30 million seconds in a year, their output is 1 phone every 3 seconds

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Xiaomi said assembling a smartphone from circuit board to finished product takes about six seconds, and, at full capacity, the factory could produce more than 10 million devices annually.

That sounds like the final assembly takes six seconds, which is entirely plausible given how fast robots move.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

assembling a smartphone from circuit board to finished product

I disagree, that phrasing suggests from assembling the circuit board to finished product, which I believe is impossible in 6 seconds, simply due to soldering time for components alone. The 6 seconds is only achievable on a "per unit" basis because they can make multiple units in parallel on the production line.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You should really read the article

Literally the sentence after that points out the production output is 10 million per year, which is 1 phone every ~3 seconds

They are indeed claiming to put together a unit, start to finish, in 6 seconds. Implying they only have 2-3 parallel production lines

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Claiming is one thing, showing video footage is another.

If true, very impressive.

I have seen videos of pick'n'place machines. But I can't imagine the solder baking, screwing and final assembly and preparing for the packaging taking only 6 seconds.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You should really read the article

I love the optimism.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

You should really think more about what you say. We're talking about final assembly, not soldering individual components onto the board.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also that’s not that impressive. 30 million devices is roughly one per second year round. Phone manufacturers make many times that in a year.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the "6 seconds" part is just a clickbait. The "near-fully automated" part is interesting.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An estimated 1.4 billion cell phones are sold each year.

Apple clears about 8 iPhones a second year-round, with ~250 million.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How many cell phones does one need?

[–] johsny@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I need 8 per second. Keep dropping them.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If it were 9 that would just be e-wasteful. 7-8 is the sweet spot.