this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
748 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

18326 readers
1366 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I very clearly stated "as someone who understands, if not necessarily openly espouses, anti-natalist ideology". I am suggesting that I, personally, think that my original 7th premise is becoming closer and closer to logical truth. I believe, as something close to an anti-natalist, that everyone needs to do their own cost-benefit analysis to determine whether they can accept the culpability of deciding to bring an unconsenting entity into the horrific world in which we currently live. So, just because I don't believe in forcibly converting everyone to the cause, doesn't mean I don't believe in it, just like not every Christian is an evangelical. Anyone who believes that there is a moral imperative to forcibly stop others from having children is clearly fundamentally misunderstanding the reasons why anti-natalist principles are so attractive (much like how evangelicals display a fundamental misunderstanding of Christian theology)

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you're putting a lot of work going to bat for, and feeling contentious for people who are, and I say this a little respect, largely crazy.

The vast majority of people who feel the way you do, do not identify as anti-anything and just live their lives and either change their minds later or they don't.

Anti-natalists are, as a self-identifying group, really bad lol. I'm sorry but they're deeply stuck up their own ass, personally and as a human value system. Just do whatever for whatever reasons and don't wear a uniform, once you do you end up doing really weird things.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that sounds like someone seriously in need of mental healthcare. I guess I just haven't seen all of these crazies you claim make up the entirety of the group. I honestly do believe that anyone who is still pro-natalist is either not thinking very clearly, or is likely to be part of the groups making it immoral to have a child, because it seems like a very simple logical conclusion. I just believe that such arguments are clearly superior to anything pro-natalists have offered, and so all that is necessary is to talk to people. Just put off having kids for a few years until you know whether irresponsibly risking creating a life of misery is right for you!

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

After swimming around all of this for way too long, I'm also entirely convinced that anyone who connects with or espouses pro-natalism is just hung up on some sexual kink. Almost strictly. And I know it's hyperbolic but I've gone way harder and deeper trying to dismantle those weirdos than I have here, and it's so deeply connected to the trad-wife cosplay kink thing and conservative-masked race-play fantasy that the entire online pro-natalist sphere is just a hookup app at this point.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Wholeheartedly agree, though I think that such a person could also simultaneously be trying to repress the rights of women, not just have a sex kink. It can be both things.