this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
212 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

15416 readers
304 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huppakee@piefed.social 50 points 2 months ago (15 children)

When there are road works they tend to close the high way or at least some lanes because a hi vis jacket doesn't protect you against speeding lunatics.

[–] mjr 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There are also a lot of photos of hi-vis roadworks and emergency vehicles that motorists have crashed into. It's almost like it's not visibility that's the problem…

[–] guywithadeathwish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I recall there being a phenomenon where drivers brains actually filter out hi-vis jackets as "unimportant data" because we see them so much.

[–] mjr 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the "urban camouflage" theory. Or they expect us to be slow or static like a roadworker or emergency worker and so botch the overtake.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think the issue was the car its self was not visible enough to the emergency vehicles. Car drivers should be wearing reflective gear and helmets, and the car should be fully reflective.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] mjr 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

We are not invisible. The problem is that motorists aren't looking or aren't caring. Put some plain-clothes cops on bikes as bait and catch the incompetent.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] mjr 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It really doesn't, especially if it makes you look less like an ordinary human. You absolutely don't want them to think you're an expert rider who doesn't need space, or something like that.

You don't need them to see you from space. You need them to see you from just far enough away, but actually care enough not to endanger you.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Bizarre to argue against added visibility improving safety

[–] mjr 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, truth is often stranger than fiction. Look at the research. Once a threshhold of visibility is achieved, more is not better. Beyond a point, more is actually detrimental.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 2 months ago

Sounds interesting. Do you have these studies? I've always just read that visibility is a plus in traffic.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're trying to argue a nuanced point and yall are being intentionally pedantic as to miss it, for shame.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm so far under the impression that added visibility is still good. They referenced studies saying there's a dropoff where it causes more harm than good, as mentioned earlier, but I haven't seen that yet

So pump the brakes a bit, friend

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Nah friend my fixie doesn't have brakes to pump, you replied with the same one-liner twice in a row without engaging anything they said, not cool!

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

same one-liner

It's a simple point, for the nuance I'd like to see something to change my mind tbh. I'm under the impression that unless you go ridiculous then added visibility helps everyone

my fixie doesn't have brakes to pump

Hah is that a joke about the stereotype? Pretty good

load more comments (11 replies)