this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
406 points (97.9% liked)

movies

2553 readers
213 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You're describing a valid criticism of Capitalism, which I share 100%.
I just don't think that translates well to a direct guilt for Cameron.
He couldn't have brought his movies to the screen if he didn't work within this system.
Of course now that he's been successful, he could definitely donate his wealth.

On the other hand, I could also donate all $50k of my life savings without starving, while others are currently starving.
And I'm not going to do it. I carry the same type of guilt, only with lower numbers.

Solidarity is working within the system. If he has the ability to negotiate that compensation for himself he can negotiate it for the other people working on the project instead, he just didn't.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I think Keanu Reeves and the Matrix is a good example of being in the system and sharing within it.