this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
1442 points (98.4% liked)
Political Humor
1823 readers
277 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only militia's, or similar groups, the US have fought in recent history have been Vietnamese, North Koreans, Nicaraguans, Iraqi's, and Afghanistani's who, apart from their formal militaries, were militia groups hiding in caves 9 times out of 10. This isn't a discussion about who they were or what they hoped to be, but about the effectiveness of their resistance and the impact on their lives.
For a group to effectively rebel within the US it would require a complete abandonment of normal life and even then it likely wouldn't be meaningfully effective.
Yeah, most American's don't want to give up literally everything to become an ineffectual or powerless martyr. Let's get it straight, unless there is a coordinated effort (such as a state originated rebellion like the civil war) then no person has enough power in the US to effectively make a difference. There aren't enough people universally coordinated to cause an effective general strike, instead it just means getting fired from your job. If you join a rebellion then your family has to subsist without you.
The Overton Window has shifted too far for a rebellion to spontaneously ignite.