this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
141 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

28818 readers
1130 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To understand terminal capitalism, first you must understand recursion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny but I have an itch to note that this is a simple infinite loop, not a recursion.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What is capitalism if not recursion? Spending more and more resources on falling into a bottomless pit.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to be pedantic, and I do appreciate the humor, but that's not recursion either :3 Recursion doesn't need to be endless. Recursive functions can absolutely have logical termination.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What does capitalism do but logically terminate resources?

But note taken. I just think the comparison is inspiring.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Logically terminating resources does not imply a terminating logic loop. Clever wordplay, though.

Recursion has a specific definition. It means solving a problem by breaking a process down into smaller and smaller self-similar pieces until reaching the "base case". In programming, it (almost) always means a function that calls itself as part of its internal logic. Depending on what the function does and the conditions for returning a value from the function, it may do that one time, many times, or not at all. A classic example is the Boggle solver.

I did say I was being pedantic :P

Oh, I meant the ping pong loop of the GitHub bot and it was pure technical nitpicking. But since you're asking, the definition of recursion is a function calling itself. I find it difficult thinking about capitalism as a single function. For me it looks more like running an infinite loop on finite resources. But applying a technical term as a metaphor leaves a lot of room for interpretation, so there is no right or wrong