this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
699 points (99.4% liked)

News

35774 readers
2415 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. citizen on her way to a medical appointment in Minneapolis was dragged out of her car and detained by immigration officers, according to a statement released by the woman on Thursday, after a video of her arrest drew millions of views on social media.

Aliya Rahman said she was brought to a detention centre where she was denied medical care and lost consciousness. The Department of Homeland Security said she was an agitator who was obstructing ICE agents conducting arrests in the area.

That video is the latest in a deluge of online content that documents an intensifying immigration crackdown across the midwestern city, as thousands of federal agents make arrests amid protests against what local officials have likened to a "federal invasion."

Rahman says she was on her way to a routine appointment at the Traumatic Brain Injury Center when she encountered federal immigration agents at an intersection. Video appears to show agents shouting commands over a cacophony of whistles, car horns and screams from protesters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

You should post this on x.com or something. Imagine thinking anyone on this site didn't vote.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

"voting is wrong" was an incredibly popular position on lemmy

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

people conflated "voting won't save us" with "voting won't do anything". If voting was useless they wouldn't try so hard to stop people from doing it. But also, voting one day a year and shrugging your shoulders 364 days and year cause "I voted" wasn't enough.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 weeks ago

yup. this is my position, too. get active, stay active.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don't think I've actually seen that in the wild. Usually what I see is either "voting is insufficient" as in, "historically voting has not ended a dictator's career" or just badly disguised bad faith/bot stuff often from accounts banned before I read their comments.

I feel like "voting is wrong" is what a group of the latter (bot farmers/trolls) want folks to believe is a real opinion here but I haven't seen anyone make that argument in good faith. I've only ever seen it made secondhand in a way that makes it about as credible as a sasquatch sighting (which there 100% are people dressing up as the sasquatch to fuck with people, so real sasquatch sightings =/= real sasquatches existing)

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 weeks ago

You would be quite surprised by the amount of Americans on here who didn't vote. I have come across quite a lot

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

There's entire groups on Lemmy where you get banned if you support either US party

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Were you not here before the election...?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah there were a lot of bot/troll accounts saying that stuff. The fact it disappeared after the election proves the point: nobody actually believes that. If somebody dresses up as a sasquatch and runs through the woods it doesn't mean sasquatches are real even though it may be followed by credible accounts and videos of a sasquatch running through the woods.

Elections are when there's a heavy financial incentive for some folks to make bad faith arguments to everyone they can.

[–] rustyfish@piefed.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So it’s trolls as long as it “proves” your point? Buddy, I like the drugs you do 👍🏼

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It proves the point because sock puppets are real thing thats been documented. Can you say for certain none of the 'left wing activist' people that has replied to a comment around an election is not a sockpuppet account or bot?

I think if you cannot find these people in the real world AND they only show up around election time AND no notable, verified people online are espousing the same stuff then its a reasonable assumption its fabricated.

The right wing in particular uses a lot of sockpuppets and has a history of invented strawmen. There are instances of republican senators playing black republicans online.

Its either an effective tactic because they're constantly in power or its something they believe works.