this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

Melbourne

2166 readers
98 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that affect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Part of me is inclined to say might as well keep going with the games, but then I think sunk cost fallacy.

Does anyone even care about the commonwealth games?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cooopsspace 12 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Whether you like Dan or not I think this is the correct call. I believe Dan was counting on some federal funding to make this happen and that Albo probably pulled it in favour of a surplus.

So instead of spending the extra couple of billion, we would also need to spend the couple of billion we should have gotten federally and we got screwed instead.

On that though, I think Dan needs to appoint a successor and plan to retire.

[–] cuavas@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Victorian Labor has a nasty habit of signing up for things they can’t afford, and then hoping the federal government foots the bill.

Also, this should really put into perspective how small the $5M settlement for COVID lockdown is in the scale of things.

[–] cooopsspace 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Im sure they actually discussed it beforehand, no hoping here.

And it was affordable until inflation and crippled building industry kicks in.

[–] cuavas@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

No, they made assumptions about receiving funding from the federal government and local councils without receiving any commitments: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/victoria/victoria-banked-on-getting-200m-in-federal-funding-when-it-bid-for-games-20230820-p5dxyt.html

It was never going to be affordable given how much security would cost with it split across regional areas. It was always going to saddle the regional areas with the cost of maintaining sports facilities they’ll never fully utilise.

load more comments (3 replies)