News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
To anyone who didn’t vote last year because they didn’t like the democrats position to a 100%:
I hope you are happy with what you have enabled. You must feel quite clever right now❤️
I hate the establishment Dems, neo-liberals suck. But I still voted for them because the actual Fascists and Nazis were unconscionable.
It's like a choice between getting a cavity and getting curb stomped.
Exactly.
It's more like a choice between voting for Nazi Germany or voting for Vichy France
Having two federal parties with the Dems and Republicans being the only feasible options sounds antidemocratic. A true democracy would be a bit more.. representative.
I would adore having a half dozen political parties along the spectrum to vote for. I wouldn't vote for anything less than mild progressivism but still.
Our voting system is fucked is the problem.
BuT TeH GeNoCiDe D:
Great job, now we have genocide AND this bullshit. Thank you so much for saving Palestine! You fucking did it, I guess.
Trump: Yes to Genocide
Harris: I see you, I hear you, but also Yes to Genocide
I voted for Harris because obviously but also I 100% put the blame where it belongs: the DNC.
Oh, they sure AF do. Just talked to one of these dipsticks in person recently. They feel very clever and smug and look forward to accelerating shit into some kind of Marxist utopia.
And of course, the 'net is lousy with these types.
It's all so dumb.
You should post this on x.com or something. Imagine thinking anyone on this site didn't vote.
"voting is wrong" was an incredibly popular position on lemmy
people conflated "voting won't save us" with "voting won't do anything". If voting was useless they wouldn't try so hard to stop people from doing it. But also, voting one day a year and shrugging your shoulders 364 days and year cause "I voted" wasn't enough.
yup. this is my position, too. get active, stay active.
I don't think I've actually seen that in the wild. Usually what I see is either "voting is insufficient" as in, "historically voting has not ended a dictator's career" or just badly disguised bad faith/bot stuff often from accounts banned before I read their comments.
I feel like "voting is wrong" is what a group of the latter (bot farmers/trolls) want folks to believe is a real opinion here but I haven't seen anyone make that argument in good faith. I've only ever seen it made secondhand in a way that makes it about as credible as a sasquatch sighting (which there 100% are people dressing up as the sasquatch to fuck with people, so real sasquatch sightings =/= real sasquatches existing)
You would be quite surprised by the amount of Americans on here who didn't vote. I have come across quite a lot
There's entire groups on Lemmy where you get banned if you support either US party
Were you not here before the election...?
Yeah there were a lot of bot/troll accounts saying that stuff. The fact it disappeared after the election proves the point: nobody actually believes that. If somebody dresses up as a sasquatch and runs through the woods it doesn't mean sasquatches are real even though it may be followed by credible accounts and videos of a sasquatch running through the woods.
Elections are when there's a heavy financial incentive for some folks to make bad faith arguments to everyone they can.
So it’s trolls as long as it “proves” your point? Buddy, I like the drugs you do 👍🏼
It proves the point because sock puppets are real thing thats been documented. Can you say for certain none of the 'left wing activist' people that has replied to a comment around an election is not a sockpuppet account or bot?
I think if you cannot find these people in the real world AND they only show up around election time AND no notable, verified people online are espousing the same stuff then its a reasonable assumption its fabricated.
The right wing in particular uses a lot of sockpuppets and has a history of invented strawmen. There are instances of republican senators playing black republicans online.
Its either an effective tactic because they're constantly in power or its something they believe works.
The DNC did the enabling. They had plenty of opportunity to run a viable candidate or run a stronger campaign with the candidate they settled for and did neither.
Yeah, because why blame the corrupt leadership for offering people shit to eat, blame the people for not being happy eating their shit, because look how much worse shit can be shoved down your throat if you don't like it!
Quit trying to divide the left. At this point, I'm going to have to assume you're a Republican if you're still doing this shit a year after the election.
People who opposed the monster won't feel offended by that. Normies won't be here to see it.
And some of these hardline ultrapurists has to be shamed into doing the right thing
Liberals are the Center and the Democratic party is Center/Near Right.
Still blaming Bernie for you picking unelectable candidates.
yup...can run the numbers, he won the popular vote. the "palestine or nothing" people are a drop in the bucket
the overwhelming majority of the country doesn't have the privilege of caring about people outside their immediate bubble...they're too busy living paycheck to paycheck
don't run on "nothing will fundamentally change" if you want americans to vote for you, simple as. maybe also don't run fucking republicans endorsements during the DNC...
i'm honestly not sure what's worse, if establishment dems are largely just controlled opposition or if they're really just this incompetent
100%. “Everything’s fine, stop complaining” wasn’t a good platform in 2016. Or 2020. Or 2024.
Donald walked through a door that liberal democrats opened.
TWICE.
Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and 2020 and still was below 50% in 2024 AND his policies never got support from a majority ever when presented without a name.
There has never been a majority who has liked anything he had to offer.
This was a propaganda war from racist wealthy assholes who bought out a ton of the companies controlling the media landscape. They exploited bullshit election rules and lied and bribed and extorted to suppress resistance, all just so they could be assholes in public without being called in it.
So he’s incredibly unpopular.
And he’s beat democrats two out of the last thee tries.
Do. The. Math.
If you asked people about their policies and literally absolutely anything they wanted to do, and hid the names, Trump always lost because he is MORE unpopular
Media helped Trump steal credit for things others did, instill fear of things his opponents never would do, etc. Nobody lost to Trump by being a worse candidate, but because media refused to be honest and people believed the lies
What’s the excuse for Dems losing the second time to Donald?
Did you not pay attention to how Kamala was called a liar by media for saying Trump would send the military against cities?
... And then he did?
Did you not pay attention to how he claimed credit for Covid funds that Democrats established? Blaming Democrats for Trump judges' decisions? Setting up Afghanistan so the exit would happen at the start of Biden's turn to hurt his approval when it predictably turns to chaos? How Biden's age was somehow a problem but Trump's never was?
Media was hysterical about how democrats would make everything worse somehow but never explaining it, then repeating Trump's claims that he's deliver the best economy ever and all kinds of bullshit like it.
And with all that Trump still didn't even get 50%!
And Kamala did worse. What’s your point? That Kamala scored worse than a fascist dictator?
RUN. BETTER. CANDIDATES.
Every time the policies and suggestions and everything else was presented without names, Kamala's campaign won. When people didn't know who's proposal they was listening to, Kamala won.
So please explain what you mean about better candidate, because you have said nothing about how she was worse.
From here in Sweden, it looks like the things needing replacement is the fucking electorate and the billionaires owning the media companies
No, it turns out running mediocre candidates campaigning on a platform of "At least I'm not Trump" was a losing move
What part of the campaign was worse
Please specify
they wanted to use the threat of fascism to earn free votes, even though they tried that in virginia in 2021 and it failed miserably.
a lot of it comes down to that they're more convinced by their consultants what works than by the evidence of what works. and their consultants all come from a class of people who make more money the closer an election is to 50/50
Hey shitbird. ♥️
Encouraging those people to rise up and act:
✅ Helpful!
Shaming and mocking people for choosing their conscience instead of understanding game theory, well over a year ago:
❌ Being a shitbird
I will keep shaming people if they think they are oh so clever while doing some of the dumbest shit one could imagine.
Idiots need to be put in their place. Like you. Be quiet 🤫
Yes, shitbird, they do think that don't they.
Never.