this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
1216 points (99.7% liked)

News

35774 readers
2651 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Or he could fucking prosecute them now...

I had a lot of hopes for Walz until he was in a position to actually do something. It makes sense now why the neoliberals threw him with Kamala.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 100 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It would be nice.... But I think we're running into politicians discovering that the American police state is above the law.

I don't think anyone wants to address the elephant in the room that even if the governor of a state had the balls to order state police to arrest ice agents, they wouldn't obey the order.

Cops in Minnesota have already released press statements that they side with "law enforcement", and you really can't prosecute anyone if you aren't able to detain them in the first place.

States need to start banning police fraternities and unions and firing any cop who isn't willing to follow the rule of law.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So just keep firing police chiefs until you find one who will.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 34 points 1 month ago

Again.... I'm not sure that officers would follow the orders even if you could find a police chief willing to stand up to the fraternal orders.

We're in the age old "who watches the watchmen" scenario. Politicians over decades have empowered the police to protect their classes self interest to the point where we don't really have a way to control them any more.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Or start deputizing people who will. Police say they won't help? There's plenty of people out there who will. The admin wants to claim it's a Wild West city? Treat it like one.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

They don't exist.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think anyone wants to address the elephant in the room that even if the governor of a state had the balls to order state police to arrest ice agents, they wouldn't obey the order.

I think the issue is more that if a governor did that, the president would use the CIA, and homeland security to kidnap that governor and their wife right out of their home and then call in the army to pacify the situation.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It indicative of the belief that people work for government officials...

Like. Step back and think for a second about all the fucking police resources a city has, all the surveillance and shit that goes on.

If he wanted to gather information on who ICE is, he has avenues to identify them besides asking residents to follow them around with cameras knowing full and well that gets people attacked by ICE.

If Walz was still a highschool football coach and saying this, I'd give him props.

But he's a fucking governor...

He's better than Jeffries and Schumer, but that's not enough for a mayor these days, let alone someone running an entire fucking state. Bunch of words and zero action just like Newspm and Pritzker. If shit was fine they could be decent leaders, but they've shown time and time again they won't take any actual action when we're being murdered in their states by federal agents.

They don't have the fight in them, so we can't afford to let them be leaders during a fight.

Quick edit:

Like, he can just have cops follow ICE and document with their body cams or even a dude with a camera. That would be much better evidence later. And they could actually intervene when ICE breaks the law.

He can use stingrays to ping their phones as the roll out of where they deploy from

He can have cops detain them

There are so many more options a state has to stop federal overreach and abuses than random citizens can.

Walz ain't asking us to help. He's telling us he won't do shit and it's on us

And if that's what he wants to do, he can get the fuck out of the way and let someone else lead while he follows

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not ready to write him off yet. He's walking a knife edge right now, and has to be careful. If he deploys the National Guard, or even the police, he's kicking off a Civil War, and that will give Trump all the rationalization he needs to invoke the Insurrection Act, or even Martial Law. Walz knows we have to keep a lid on things and stay totally on the side of Constitutional law, until after the Midterms.

I'm still holding out hope that he has a plan once he's done with being governor. I wouldn't be surprised to see him run for president.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

until after the Midterms

Are we still pretending we're having those? Trump isn't.

https://time.com/7346834/trump-canceling-midterm-elections-joking-white-house/

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pedo hitler can say whatever he wants, but the states run their own elections. If my state suspends elections I will bring a lawsuit for violation of my right to vote.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago

50 giant class action lawsuits would be fun.

[–] synapse3252@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you'll have bigger issues at that point

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

If elections are canceled that will be the biggest issue in the nation and will be a greenlight to the ever growing number of protesters and generally dissatisfied citizens.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

I think they will "happen" but they won't be legitimate. There is going to be voter intimidation across the board, and ICE is going to post up at blue polling locations. And theyre going to continue to try to invalidate mail in voting.

[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They’ll probably take place, but ICE will be hanging out at polling locations to assault/detain/disappear people they don’t think will vote “correctly.”

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

They're totally sleeping on

"We're gonna build up Walz, and make Trump/ICE pay for it!"

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He needs to gather good evidence before getting indictments. See how some of the most egregious prosecutorial overreaches of the Trump administration have been sidelined by grand juries who don't indict. That is one institution where the local processes haven't been infected by Trumpism. Minnesota prosecutors need to play by the rules, because at least for the time being, the rules are on their side.

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 2 points 1 month ago

I was interested in him initially, because he appealed to old white men in some ways, until I saw that debate. Deer in the headlights.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please explain what you’d like him to do and how he’d do it legally

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He can call the National Guard to remove ICE by force, states still have power.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He absolutely cannot do that show me where states have that power to just unilaterally expel federal agents by force

Edit: here’s what states can do which is sue about it under the 10th amendment but they cannot just use the national guard to expel ice agents

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/14/us/minnesota-illinois-lawsuits-tenth-amendment

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am a strong advocate that every state with a ICE invasion should dispatch their National Guard, 1:1 for each Federal agent in their state, with orders to simply observe and take body cam footage. Rent rooms in the hotel next door, track their cars with all their fancy surveillance equipment, track all the doors they knock down (and ask them for their warrants).

I think we will see a marked behavior shift in ICE if they realize that everything they do is being watched and recorded for posterity.

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cheeto Mussolini would just federalize them. Don't know if he can legally do that, but laws don't matter anymore, it seems.

I think his hands are a somewhat tied, but his call to action is pretty weak. I wish anyone would just call this evil Nazi shit what it is.