Comic Strips

21141 readers

1943 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

447

Birth Control (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 days ago by hdp4@feddit.online to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

262 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why are there dozens of different birth control options for women, and men have exactly condoms, permanent sterilization and nothing else?

Because only the female body has a built-in 'fertility off' mode (pregnancy) that pharmacopoeia can manipulate. The most effective contraceptive methods we have all depend on tricking the female body into thinking it's pregnant when it isn't. The reason women have so many options is simply because there are a lot of different ways to accomplish that 'trickery', pharmaceutically. Women also only have one real barrier method, the diaphragm. It's even shittier than condoms, re efficacy.

Those are just the biological facts of the matter. It's not some sinister scheme to pass the buck from men to women. The above is exacerbated by the simple fact that it's about stopping one egg a month versus stopping millions of constantly-created sperm.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

There's been various methods for blocking sperm from travelling down the vas deferens that managed to get through studies and then just got dropped.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vas-occlusive_contraception

Edit: This is what Wikipedia has to say on that topic:

Despite this, pharmaceutical companies are reluctant to lose market share of a thriving global market for female contraceptives and condoms which bring billions of dollars of revenue each year. Initially, RISUG attracted some interest from pharmaceutical companies. However, considering that RISUG is an inexpensive, one-time procedure, manufacturers retracted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_under_guidance

That kind of procedure would wipe out most of the contraceptive industry. And of course that can't be allowed.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's one of those things that's beneficial but not profitable (like the postal service), and therefore a 'service' that the government should be providing with tax revenue, imo.