this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
41 points (95.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36656 readers
1187 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I wonder if the majority of people on here spend more than 13 hours a day. It seems crazy to me spending that much time looking at screens but when I see how much time some programming projects take I think wow, they must be looking at screens 80 hours a week to pull this work off.

I sometimes want to watch tv or play video games after work but after already staring at a screen for 9 hours, I have to read a book or do some other activity. Im not sure its good for us.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Are screens bad or are the primary ideas about screen time based on when screens solely offered content to consume without interaction?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

"Screen are bad and you'll become blind!"

-said mom who now scrolls WeChat all the time

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Looking a mere 30cm in front of you for extended periods of time isn't great either, along with a lack of excercise. Not unique to computers, but there are multiple reasons which combined can make prolonged PC or phone usage unhealthy.

-- Someone who spends a lot of time in front of a computer.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

My solution is that my screen is 20 feet away and battery powered, and I keep the batteries on a separate floor, so every 2 hours, I have to get up and do the stairs at the very minimum. But I also tend to walk around or do my life while using the screen, since it also floats around and follows me wherever I go. And when not using a floating screen, I just visit other random worlds that tend to involve alot of exercise, like people trying to murder me but I have swords, or magic, or guns... or maybe a world where the objective is dancing... but usually the murder worlds.

Been doing VR for 10 years now, only the most recent headset (Quest 3) has been a full-day headset, before that, most headsets were 6-10 hours at most even fully modded. Looking forward to future headsets too, now that they don't have to come from meta anymore to be good. It's crazy how much firing most of their workforce and replacing them with AI has tanked their software and firmware dev. They used to have it all(enough that it was worth buying their stuff despite meaning you have to buy 'their' stuff), but then they threw away what they had, first the software and firmware, and then at a critical point of time they decided to throw away hardware too.

Looking forward mostly to Steam Frame at the moment. And of course with my lifestyle, the number 1 expansion port upgrade I'll be getting is high-res color passthrough. Glad I get to pick it rather than having to use whatever is good enough/cheap enough for everyone. I would easily sink 200$ into that feature alone if someone makes one worth it. Rather than whatever 20 dollar 'pretty good' option would have made sense to include en masse by default.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

That's very fair. Not necessarily the screen itself or the mental effects, but the associated activities. I commented a bit blindly because I'm locked into a screentime lifestyle. Can't do my job without 8 hours at a screen and the cheapest hobbies tend to be on another screen. I forget what I've had to incorporate into my habits to fight that sedentarianism. I'm still not great at avoiding it.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Personally, I think both are pretty bad, but yeah, spending extended periods of time in front of a computer screen isn't very healthy. They've already stated in another comment about the physical aspects of it with being 30 centimeters from the screen.

But there's also the social development aspect of it. At the end of the day, humans are social creatures, regardless if you are an introvert or extrovert. You still need some amount of socialization. Many people that are habitually on computers have converted that socialization over to some digital platform like Discord(guilty as charged), Or have moved to a text based socialization. While this may meet our needs as human beings for socialization, It disconnects us from our emotions, and hinders our ability to have direct conversation.

The consequences of tone doesn't matter much online, which makes us more apt to respond or be blunt for discussion. The lack of video or a face also weakens the ability to be able to analyze body language, to be able to properly analyze the intent of the other parties. These attributes are crucial for communication.

Things such as going in for job interview are now digitalozed (or in some fields discarded all together). Instances such as calling someone to verify an appointment or to ask questions are being replaced with text-based communications or no communication needed portals. We are currently seeing this among the millennials and Gen Z's, but even the older Gen A's are starting to show signs of a weaker ability to have face-to-face communication and be able to interpret body language. I've never liked talking on the phone in the first place, but my sister, who's younger than me, avoids it like the plague. It's to the point where if the thing that she's doing doesn't have an online portal or an ability to text, she isn't going to do it. Because she's not comfortable with having phone calls outside of her social circle, and she isn't comfortable going and meeting someone to ask in person. When I've talked to her about it, she's stated that she's not different than most of her friend group, and that that's just how it is now.

It's scary.