this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
686 points (98.6% liked)

News

34177 readers
2925 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A website dedicated to naming ICE and Border Patrol employees is coming under a “prolonged and sophisticated” cyber attack after the Daily Beast revealed it planned to make public 4,500 names of federal immigration staff.

The founder of ICE List said the website was overwhelmed by malicious web traffic originating in Russia after the Beast reported that a huge cache of personal IDs had been leaked to the site by an alleged Department of Homeland Security whistleblower.

The Direct Denial of Service (DDOS) assault, which began on Tuesday evening and is still ongoing at the time of publication, saw a huge number of IPs simultaneously access the website of ICE List, a self-styled “accountability initiative.”

This has successfully overloaded the ICE List’s servers and is preventing people from accessing the site. The timing coincided with ICE List founder Dominick Skinner telling the Daily Beast he would make public the first tranche of names in the dataset, which was leaked following the shooting by an ICE agent of mom Renee Nicole Good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 210 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The Direct Denial of Service (DDOS) assault,

That's not was DDOS means: Distributed Denial of Service

...meaning it comes from so many different sources its very hard to block.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the daily beast, would not be surprised if the article was AI hallucinated based on a few tweets or something

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it possible to filter posts by url on lemmy? I don't want to see more daily beast slop...

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

The reason I used Daily Beast was because I was looking for info on Icelist earlier today to see if there was any news on what happened ... and Daily Beast was the only site that had up-to-date info.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

It's a common acronym. This isn't the kind of thing an LLM would screw up, in my experience, I'd put my money on human error for this one.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Ding ding ding

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It sounds to me like a simple region block would do the trick nicely. It's not like this website is intended for a Russian audience so block them all and be done with it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People are getting dumber about computers, not smarter. You heard it here first.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I’ve known this for a long time. When I was a kid I was conscripted into doing tech support for my older relatives. Now my generation is doing tech support for the younger generations.

When my generation dies it’ll kick off a post-apocalyptic future where people have to rediscover how all this technology works.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Now my generation is doing tech support for the younger generations.

Or having to teach them how to write and debug code in COBOL.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree about people getting dumber about computers, but sadly you're not the first to say it.

I see it in my IT work everyday. It makes for some good job security, but I wonder what happens when the last of us that know how to work the dark magics shuffle off our mortal coil.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Then the AI overlords’ takeover will be complete. Dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In an ideal world, as they see your knowledge is harder and harder to replace, they'll start paying more for it, and that will hopefully be encouraging enough to the current workforce to learn the skills.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In an ideal world, as they see your knowledge is harder and harder to replace, they’ll start paying more for it

This is true and happens to me.

, and that will hopefully be encouraging enough to the current workforce to learn the skills.

Here's the challenge. Someone new that doesn't have the skills that is enticed by the money has to make two evaluations:

  • How hard is it to learn the skill?
  • How long with the skill be marketable?

For me to learn the skill wasn't difficult because is it was modern and contemporary technology at the time. Training and support resources existed, and I was able to incrementally learn how those older technologies continued to evolve or be accommodated as new technologies arrived to replace them, but then didn't. That won't be the case for someone new. They can't even use the old training material I used (assuming it was even still around) because that was written assuming the technology pervasive and well supported while the opposite is true today.

As for marketability, this is an even larger gamble. Many of these technologies should have been retired decades ago, but weren't for a variety of niche reasons. No organizations are putting out new deployments of these old technologies. The customer base/employers wanting these skills decrease every year as old legacy systems are finally retired leaving even fewer opportunities for a new person to exercise these newly acquired old skills. Its a fact that someday there will be no users of them, but when will that be? It should have happened already so what new worker would want to try and gamble on going into extensive learning on technologies that should be dead by the time they master them?

Oh, if you're talking about outdated technology as well, then that definitely gets harder.

They might have to face the decision to at least redo it with modern tech as these people are at least willing to learn that.

Or it could go like COBOL where the change is just so insurmountable, at least some jobs might exist for a very long time.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

All of us who grew up as computers became mainstream had to learn how to use them and troubleshoot things, we also got to grow up as it was maturing.

These newer generations are handed tablets with apps and that's it, and all the apps they want to use are focused around tiny attention spans and how to manipulate them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, back in OOUUURRRRR DAYYYYY, the only computer was Windows and nothing ran until we edited the AUTOEXEC.BAT just to find out the .dll our sneakernet shareware software installed munged up the TCP/IP stack and we had to spend two hours and find the Windows install media to remove and replace it and THEN it would work until we installed something else.

And we LIKED it that way! We loved it!

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I had to learn how to navigate Windows 3.0 using keyboard commands with no screen. I had to fix the resolution when I set it too high and the display was a 4 pixel tall line across the screen. Way back before preview and accept changes existed.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I remember back in the day in my highschool computer science class, altering the autoexec.bat to mess with the next student in fun ways. Nothing that would stop them, but simply give them pause.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Same as with cars. Everyone just wants to press a button and go.

[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article literakky says "a huge number of IPs". Do you have more information?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I gave the proper definition of the acronym where the article did not. I'm not making commentary on the article topic.

[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry I misread your comment.

You are right, this definition is wrong.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago