this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
776 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

21141 readers
1971 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/nonpolitical_comics/p/1657114/mr-lovenstein-volume


Hey everyone! In case you haven't noticed, this is a new community focused on NonPolitical Comics (NPCs), which essentially means no gloom and doom of the day stuff. If you like the idea, help out by upvoting, commenting, or even talking about us! Remember, click like and subscribe!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 97 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Blame the sound designer. You can emulate whispering without altering the volume.

Very few media players have autobalancers.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Only of it was made for TV. This is often a problem with theatrical releases because the audio is not retuned for home viewing.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

No, blame the streaming companies. Dynamic range is a known standard. All they need is:

  • a "louder dialogue" toggle switch to amplify the center channel in the downmixing settings (Kodi, many TVs, and all dedicated receivers can already do this FYI for this exact reason)
  • a "night mode" toggle switch that turns on an audio compressor (my 20 year-old receiver has that feature -- it's hardly rocket science; I believe YouTube calls it "stabilized audio").

Upsides:

  • preserves high dynamic range mix for audiophiles
  • works with already released movies (!!!!)
  • improves the life of people with tinny speakers, strict loudness requirements, or hearing impairments

Downsides:

  • Can't feel superior to audio engineers who are doing their jobs, I guess?
  • Streaming companies need to reinvest a few thousand dollars out of the billions they are making to add those two buttons

This was going on way before Netflix was even mailing DVDs!

I remember my first experience with it was blade 1 or 2 on my dad's tv stereo setup.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 9 points 1 day ago

Ooooh! I didn't know streaming services were messing with customers this badly! Yikes!

Glad I don't use them!🏴‍☠️

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

I should really set up EasyEffects on my SteamDeck - that's the device I use to watch movies on my TV

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Part of it could either be that they’re not spending the time for a home release audio mix, don’t want to for purity’s sake or I’ve seen issues with trying to condense surround soundscapes down to stereo.

It all comes down to dynamic range and they should be using all of it for theatrical release and then remastering for home release.

TV shows do not get a pass. Cinephile audio engineers that think the vast majority of their listeners will have home theater setups are just plain delusional.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The way they do dynamic range in movie theaters sucks too. I have to wear earplugs because it's so loud.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Yes!

I may get a shit sound experience at home, but at least I have an opportunity for an even worse sound experience at my local theater, first.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Turns out when they went digital and got the popcorn kid to press play instead of a skilled projectionist, sound calibration also went away. Now they deliberately turn it up beyond the sound mixer’s specs.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 2 points 1 day ago

Around here they do calibrate the theaters but the spec says they can still be insanely loud, as long as they're not loud all the time. The peaks are well over 100 dB.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 6 points 2 days ago

while I agree with:

Cinephile audio engineers that think the vast majority of their listeners will have home theater setups are just plain delusional.

I disagree:

they’re not spending the time for a home release audio mix

From my recollection, mixing audio for different scenarios is just a function you can let the speakers decide how it will mix. Not adding this basic accessibility function in the 21c is just callousness.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Depend, people with proper high dynamic range surround sound systems shouldn't be penalised when watching content

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe include it as an option?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

By my estimates that would add up to 4ish GB to the file size per 90 minutes of content

[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Modern CPUs can downmix and compress audio without a sweat, it doesn't need to be done by the studio.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The high dynamic range 7.1 audio is already on the disc. What we're wanting is a decent stereo mixdown. Could be 128kb mp3 for all I care. Not like I'll be able to discern a higher bitrate on my tv speakers. That should require 86MB per 90 minutes.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Low dynamic range doesn't need to be low quality though

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Looking into it, there’s a range of standards for Blu-Ray in terms of video quality. I doubt there are a ton of discs that can’t afford a few of those 25-50GB. Just spitballing ways to make it approachable rather than say only one way is correct. There’s all sorts of fancy stuff going on with DTS. Maybe they could work compression into part of the standard and just include alternate mixes.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

if you're using linux slap a couple of boosting compressors on the sound using easyeffects to turn up the quiet parts

works remarkably well