316
Criminal charges against ICE agent who shot Renee Nicole Good dead looking ‘increasingly unlikely’
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
316 points (100.0% liked)
news
635 readers
893 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I read that it's largely due to established precedent that in cases where a police officer shoots a driver, (happens enough for there to be precedent) the burden of proof is to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the killer did not have cause to fear for their life. Proving something to not be the case is very difficult.
Lucky for us we have the whole thing from multiple angles, including the murderers POV because he whipped out his phone because he wanted a video of the murder that he premeditated.
It's a high bar, but this is one of the most documented murders in history.
I've seen all the videos and unfortunately there is JUST enough to cast reasonable doubt. I know it's bullshit, you know it's bullshit, everyone involved knows it's bullshit, but they can absolutely argue that he "feared for his life". Her wheels were 100% turned away from him, but was he in a position to examine the angle of her wheels when the car started moving? Or did he just react when the car started moving after he put himself less than a foot from the front corner?
Again, it's obviously bullshit. He murdered a woman. He willfully put himself in that situation and ended her fucking life because he's a fucking coward. For drawing his gun alone, he should be prosecuted, let alone firing point blank at an unarmed person posing no threat. But with the amount of leeway the justice system gives law enforcement, he will absolutely be able to argue that he had "reasonable fear" in the moment.
At least let the jury decide.