this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
1171 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

5167 readers
1832 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

Transcript

recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen Al for script- writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister's screenwriting professor said that they can use gen Al for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate a script that's any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that Al can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen Al will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you. Dude checked in a shit load of code before going on PTO for three weeks. We get pretty live plots of data, but he broke basically every hardware driver in the process.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's actually terrifying. Code has been degrading a lot in the past 10 years or so, and it looks like the LLM trend for code is doing more harm than good. I don't think that needs to be the case but it appears to be the case.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Like, Microsoft's CEO bragging that 25% of all their code was written by AI, and that was a year plus ago now so it's probably higher at this point... I don't find that reassuring, it's part of the reason I won't let my Windows workstation upgrade to 23H2 and I've almost completely converted to Linux at home (I keep the laptop running my simulator games on Windows because peripherals can be a pain to get working right without the manufacturer's software, but it's also locked to 23H2)

And I've used AI to assist me with writing code.

But that's the distinction: it assists me, it doesn't write it for me. If I don't understand how or why something works or why I would do it this way, I'm not using it in production. Far too many seem to be checking out, though, and telling their GPT to take the wheel, and that's where I think one of the biggest issues comes in.