this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

Biology

3138 readers
45 users here now

This is a general community to discuss of all things related to biology!

For a more specific community about asking questions to biologists, you can also visit:

/c/askbiologists@lemmy.world

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's nice to know, I agree. But converting from a C3 pathway to C4 for Photosynthesis via genetic engineering will save a ton of water while also potentially making them drought resistant.

[–] mr_might44@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

It might, but I think engineering plants to be drought resistant is still a long way off. There's more to going from C3 to C4 than just stomatal function, like the typical Kranz anatomy of a C4 plant and the extra biochemical steps in their carbon fixation. Then again, some common crops (like corn) are already C4 plants, so it could be possible to make them even more drought resistant. I just don't know how they'll ever improve the yield of crops under drought stress, even if they can survive it.

Edit: that doesn't mean it isn't worth looking into, of course.

[–] AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

I agree it's a long way off. I went to a conference in early 2000's and everyone was hyped for it.

Honestly I think you'd see better improvement by focusing on increasing yields in plants that are already C4 (like corn, as you mentioned). There are plenty of grass derivatives like sugarcane that are already C4 and also established crops.