Linux

11023 readers

386 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Budgie 11 Desktop Environment Will Be Ported to Qt 6, Development Kicks Off (9to5linux.com)

submitted 19 hours ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/linux@programming.dev

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Now that Budgie 10.10 is out as the last chapter in the Budgie 10 series, the devs behind this modern Linux desktop environment have kicked off the development of the next major release, Budgie 11.

Budgie developer Joshua Strobl shares with us today some interesting details about Budgie 11, such as the fact that the upcoming desktop environment will be written in the Qt 6 open-source application framework, and some steps have already been taken in this direction with the Budgie 10.10 release.

The devs already wrote Budgie Desktop Services, the beating heart of Budgie 11, in Qt 6, and they plan on writing the Budgie Display Configurator in Qt6/Kirigami as well. The end goal here is to make Budgie more modular, allowing users and integrators alike the freedom to fully configure the desktop environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I much prefer QT. The GTK ethos since Gnome 3 is basically: "We're making this for our own needs, we don't care about what you want"

And while I sympathize and understand the frustrations that downstream brings, I don't think any project not part of Gnome/GIMP should be building on it.

QT is built from the ground up to be used by anyone, regardless of needs or use case. It's a better fit for building complex software like desktop environments.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago

QT is built from the ground up to be used by anyone

Well, KDEs Qt fork (I think they have one). Qt is released proprietary and the older versions are open source. Which may make it pretty well funded but also always behind on updates.

[–] exu@feditown.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Newer GTK (through phosh and gnome-mobile) makes for great mobile applications, but no way I'm using those on the desktop.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, for my hobbyist needs I was looking at qt myself. They've both been around since 98. But you're right about gtk being focused on their use only. It's in the name. Gimp tool kit. Though these days I guess its more GNOME?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It has really only been a problem since GTK4. A lot of the rest of the GTK universe has stuck with GTK3. Now we are seeing people come up with alternative versions of libadwaita.

We should end up seeing a fork on the GTK side with GNOME going one way and everybody else another.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 13 hours ago

Tbh custom libadwaitas are kind of how GTK4 is supposed to be used.