this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
835 points (97.9% liked)
Fediverse
38804 readers
1731 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I recently noticed that when a user gets banned, all of their posts and associated threads also get removed but with no notice.
I've also seen entire discussions removed because they included some heated words, despite also including useful discussion or even one sided rebuttals. While I'm under no illusion that things can get solved here, it's annoying to see shit get deleted just because someone got upset. Even if there isn't anything useful in comments, it breaks up the discussion because any replies have lost context.
IMO if it's a disruptive user, ban them, but leave the evidence of their disruption up, unless it was spam or the kind of illegal shit that can get anyone who sees it in trouble.
Hehe, check out one of PieFed's latest new features: Deleted posts and their comments can still be read. Mods can either delete entirely (if as you say illegal or some shit) or simply remove from the normal display from the community thread, but leaving the discussion intact - e.g. answers to questions that people would like to preserve, even when the OP deletes their own post.
In short, each person is the owner of their "own" content - like a question asked to a question community - but the resulting answers and discussion do not belong to them, but rather to the individuals who offered those answers in good faith, hence are now allowed to remain (it takes active participation i.e. it is opt-in, but now it is an option whereas before it was not).