this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
264 points (100.0% liked)

Gardening

5763 readers
520 users here now

Your Ultimate Gardening Guide.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was totally green when I went on vacation. I watered it heavily beforehand knowing I would be away a couple weeks. Got back and boom, ready to eat! Not sure if it was because the soil got a bit dry. Smells very good.

Historywise, the bud started to emerge in June 2025. The plant was about 1.5 or so years old.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

That's what I've read before, that they're one-and-done. But my cousin just told me he grew a second one from a plant he had, and that an uncle of ours in Hawaii said the 3rd generation is the sweetest -- so I'm not so sure. Maybe Hawaii's climate is more conducive?

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I could also imagine that the original plant dies off after it fruites but as far as I know they produce a lot of smaller offspring at the base which will continue growth and fruiting. This way both sources would be correct.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That makes sense. Also a smaller fruit would theoretically be getting more energy from the plant and maybe develop more sugars?

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 1 points 8 hours ago

Maybe. But usually the offspring would be getting as big as the mother on their own if they weren't competing with their clos by siblings for nurtientds, water and light.

I don't know wether the 'thrid generation's the sweetest' story is true... we need an expert to confirm this I guess. :D

load more comments (2 replies)