this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
558 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

78543 readers
2958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ji59@hilariouschaos.com 6 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Fusion is possible. It just needs 20 years of research first.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Fusion was achieved decades ago. But right now it takes more energy than it produces. The theoretical possibility of energy-positive reaction is more or less established. The problem right now is engineering and a little bit of material science. And when (and if) it will be solved there will be whole another set of economical problems, how to make it a commercial product.
All of that hinges less on science and more on whatever intersection of politics, economics, and psychology occupies this space. It was always 15 years away, and it was always correct estimation, it's just it's supposed to be 15 years of founded research and development, not 15 years of begging for funding, trying to navigate political situation, and restarting everything from scratch because previous two were unsuccessful

[–] drapermache@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

It's been that way for over 40 years lol.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That is what they said. Twenty years ago.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, because the argument was never "we'll have fusion in 20 years", it's always been "we COULD have fusion in 20 years IF research was properly funded". It's never been properly funded, hence it's always 20 years away.

It's a bit like my boss coming to ask me how long it would take to do project X. I tell him 6 months after we get funding. We don't get funding. 6 months later he comes and asks me how long it would take to do project X. I tell him 6 months after we get funding. Queue shocked Pikachu face that the estimate is still 6 months, 6 months later.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Fusion would really hurt oil companies, so not going to get funded.