this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
1056 points (99.2% liked)

News

34088 readers
3810 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Fcking bitch,” Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent who killed Renee Good, says in the video.*

A newly released cellphone video, apparently filmed by the ICE officer who killed Renee Nicole Good, and obtained by Minneapolis-based Alpha News, a conservative-leaning nonprofit news site, appears to sharply contradict the U.S. government’s public account of the fatal Wednesday shooting, raising new questions about whether the agent who opened fire was ever in immediate danger.

The footage was recorded on a cellphone by ICE officer Jonathan Ross, not by a department body camera. It captures Ross’s own perspective as he approaches Good’s maroon Honda Pilot during what the Department of Homeland Security claims was a federal operation in south Minneapolis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You may want to figure it out considering where your country is headed.

You don't read the comments you respond to? Like I said, my country doesn't have those problems.

There are many ways to get a drone to fly autonomously over a short mission.

Again, simplifying and not specifying who should have one. You think every person everywhere should have a 247 drone buddy filming them?

Show me how an average person can use just 50$ to have a constant 247 4k filming surveillance drone on them. Link a product then.

Your country is not what you think it is.

No, my country isn't what you think it is, you donkey. Literally. I already told you you're assuming wrong and you just go right ahead and double down on your mistake. sigh

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If you're saying you're not American, it wasn't obvious from the context.

By the way the drone is not for surveillance. It came up in the context of guns, so I would think it were obvious what drone usage was intended. I'll not go into it here, but if you want a hint look up the state of the modern battlefield in Ukraine. Guns are almost irrelevant.

Frankly having a signal jammer and a cheap tethered drone is all you need to solve problems even a gun can't solve. Oh, and joining an improv group, if you know what I mean.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you're saying you're not American, it wasn't obvious from the context.

And nothing I said even remotely implied I am American, yet you just decided to assume that. Why, pray tell?

I would think it were obvious

What did we talk about assumptions? How are we supposed to read your mind about these hare-brained implications you keep throwing out, but refuse to actually specify?

Are you now suggesting eveyone should constantly have a tethered drone with 4k cameras, which operates autonomously btw, and has like a payload of explosives. And this you say can be acquired by anyone with 50 dollars.

And you wonder why people are weirded out?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Drones are a tool of the modern battlefield. A tethered drone does not need to fly autonomously. Of course you can program for autonomy if you have the skills, and the autonomous task for armed resistance is not overly complicated, could be as simple as a straight line path.

Can't be had for 50 dollars (I didn't say this), but learning to fly and build drones like that is available to just about anyone, and inexpensively. Moreover drones have non-killing civilian applications - SAR, emergency services, videography - so the skillset can be built without raising concerns or attention.

Ordnance is added later as needed.

Entirely hypothetical, of course. I'm not suggesting anything, but I will point out that the 2nd Amendment seems to have done absolutely nothing but cost the lives of hundreds, perhaps thousands, including young children. When it comes to it, the guns are useless. They ended up being a fashion accessory bathed in the blood of toddlers.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

a 50$ flying toy?

Drones are a tool of the modern battlefield. A tethered drone does not need to fly autonomously. Of course you can program for autonomy if you have the skills, and the autonomous task for armed resistance is not overly complicated, could be as simple as a straight line path.

Go see a psychiatrist.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure what the paste above has to do with seeing a psychiatrist. I stated technical facts about drones.

It might have made sense if you'd tied your advice to loosely evidenced geopolitical claims. You could argue they are conspiratorial.

Did you just run out of things to say?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So, first you imply everyone should have a drone, as "they're a 50 dollar toy". I ask who would be flying it and for what reason, and you refuse to specify, and then go on about how wired drones don't need to be autonomous and start rambling on about payloads and geopolitical situations.

So you think you can fly a wired drone while you're driving a car or doing something else and that said wired drone is a "50 dollar toy" despite you clearly describing military hardware?

Go. See. A. Mental. Health. Professional.