Wild Feed
A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.
-
Be cool to each other. Instance rules apply.
-
All posts should link to a *current, *good quality blog, article, editorial, listicle, research paper, or something that can be considered "news."
-
Post title should be the article title or best fit.
-
No misinformation or bigotry.
-
For paywalled media, please provide an archived link in the text body of the post.
Tag if needed:
[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.
[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.
[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.
[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.
[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.
*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason.
*Good quality means the source is reputable with a reasonably clean fact checking record.
Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.
All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.
Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.
Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.
view the rest of the comments
Homie thirsts for the crown lol
He's continuously said he doesn't want a return to monarchy, that if he came back his one goal is to help Iranians escape regimes with a fair election.
Admittedly, I only know a few statements from him as I don't often follow Iranian news.
Sometimes my satire is a bit too dry, apologies. I was doing my best “idiot hot take” à la Philomena Cunk or Ali G
Oh no worries, and my bad. I get people on every popular article who vehemently oppose actually reading it, I thought you were one of those.
I should try reading people's comments in different tones to get more perspective.
I could have also added a /s tag and I just forgot - thank you :)
I reponded to the statement about his "thirst for the crown" with his official statements about democracy, not whether his dad was a good guy.
The shah sucked and his family was rightly ousted, but thr prince was a kid when that happened.
We've all read the Wikipedia page.
I mean, I said I don't follow Iranian politics. So, pretty naive?
I still heard and read his statements on democracy, which is what I commented about. Never said I believed him.
Now I'm saying "This one guy is not this other guy. They may both suck, but they are definitely different people."
edit: I didn't remove these posts or ban this person, it was an admin action.